I want to start by inviting everyone who are looking into this post to check the git commit linked before reading and after that read their current page, it will make more sense.

I think most people don’t understand the fact that Kagi is meta-search engine which literally collect the results of other search engines and display it and add very small amount of results from their index(tecilis).

They are starting to act shady this year(check the attached git commit to see their changes to their documentation page).

People basically pay them to search Yandex and Brave for them.

Before anyone say but privacy, they are closed source and there is a better open source meta search engines which actually respect your privacy and need your donations more than Kagi shareholders.

Open source alternative:

  • rhabarba@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    SearXNG’s result quality and blocking functions are much worse than Kagi’s in my experience.

    edit: Downvoting personal experiences. Lemmy going strong again. ;-)

        • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          You can actually hide them in Voyager for example. Don’t need a special instance for it. You can also set the app to combined instead of individual tally.

          To answer your question, upvotes and downvotes are fleeting on lemmy and can be oft meaningless. You could still sort content in posts by metrics, but hide votes, and get insight out of it.

          • Telorand@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            This instance actually drops downvotes before they hit the database, so unless another instance tracks users on different instances, they simply disappear for people on this instance.

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 day ago

          Because downvotes are lazy commentary. I’d rather judge for myself what constitutes a bad take and use words to encourage or debate. I don’t need a bunch of angry keyboard warriors poisoning the discourse with voluntary polling.

          Plus, seeing a bunch of negative numbers doesn’t make anyone feel good. I would rather Lemmy be a better place than Reddit.

          • tofubl@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            I like this perspective of yours, and while I don’t think I’ll join you on your instance (I take it this was an open invitation, yes?), I’ll look into ways to hide votes on my client.

            Although I do wonder, would you prefer everyone to return to long strings of “+1” and “agreed” posts?

            • Telorand@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              22 hours ago

              Not in particular, but at least I could ostensibly set up a filter (or automod) that hid or removed low-quality comments like that. Removing downvotes is kinda the same effect.

              I’m not saying voting should go away entirely. This instance still has upvotes, after all, but Lemmy will just turn into the cynical, pessimistic, self-fallating shithole that Reddit has become if we don’t do anything differently as a community.

              (And yes, it was just an open invitation—a reminder, if you will, that The Fediverse is a cool place where you have choices regarding how you experience it.)

      • rhabarba@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        It amazes me to understand that your reply violates your instance’s ToS:

        No self-advertisements or spam

        (Still, thank you: TIL.)