this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
95 points (92.0% liked)

Data is Beautiful

1138 readers
2 users here now

Be respectful

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] conorm@feddit.uk -1 points 6 days ago

delusion at it's finest, humans are supposedly the smartest beings on this planet and yet this proportion of them are wasting their heads worrying about their former burgers' life, if the animals were meant to be worth as much as us, they would have developed metalworking by now

[–] dwindling7373@feddit.it 37 points 1 week ago

I think you guys are misunderstanding what Brits mean by that... They value both very little.

[–] Worx@lemmynsfw.com 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Kind of a weird question IMO. I don't even think animal lives are worth the same as animal lives. Is a single deer's life the same as a single ant's life?

I consider myself to be kind and thoughtful towards people and animals -- I'll save snails or worms that I find while gardening, but I also will kill mosquitos that are inside my house, and move spiders outside where they will potentially die.

This isn't even getting into "special" animals like pets

[–] ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

... but I also will kill mosquitos that are inside my house, and move spiders outside where they will potentially die.

huh, i just let the spiders be and they take out mosquitos and other bugs for me. we're symbiotico, that way.

[–] Worx@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 week ago

I'm scared of / uncomfortable with spiders, so they're not allowed inside

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Don't particularly love spiders, but I'll never kill one, even in my house.

[–] gloriousspearfish@feddit.dk 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I would also answer "Human lives are worth the same as animal lives", simply because Humans are animals.

Never trust the answers to questionnaires with such basic mistakes.

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yeah, I'd like to see the results from the question : I have a gun pointed at your long time childhood friend and one pointed at this cow, now is this cow's life worth the same as your friends life?

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have a gun pointed at your dog and another pointed at a guy that's going around eating people's pets...

You are mixing the rational component of the question in general with the emotional attachments of particular situations. This kind of "I know it in my heart" drive is the same that drives things like racism and xenophobia.

[–] MartianSands@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Their point still works though, just reword it for less unnecessary baggage if you prefer.

Do you press the button which saves some random human somewhere in the world, or the button which saves some random cow? I'm pretty sure most people choose the human

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Most people would also press a button that will save a random human of their country over a random human from another country. Does that mean people have different value depending on which country they are from?

[–] awth13@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What if your childhood friend is the cow and the other entity at gunpoint is an unfamiliar human?

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 2 points 1 week ago

The cow of course, fuck that person.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

A better comparison would be if the human in question was a random dude you pulled off the streets. If this was a cow that I grew up with and shared a bond with, then yeah, I'd obviously pick the cow over some dude I don't know. If it's a childhood friend versus a random cow I don't know? Same thing but in reverse.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

You know what it means, though.

[–] amzd@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Then why do they kill and eat them

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because humans are comically inconsistent and morally bankrupt. The history of our species is basically slavery, factory farms, and HOA’s.

[–] amzd@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] So_zetta_slowpoke@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But if I do that, there'd probably be a big ceremony saying I'm a hero and I'd have to shake people's hands 😰

[–] amzd@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Which animals hands do you think you’d need to shake?

[–] So_zetta_slowpoke@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

My dog, who is a very good boy

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 6 points 1 week ago

Interesting (or, perhaps, expected) that the more progressive/left leaning demographics correlate with a higher proportion valuing human and animal life equally. Sort of makes sense and I'm glad to see it.

[–] baggins@beehaw.org 4 points 1 week ago

My cat is worth more than a lot of humans.

Seriously, why no Liberal or Green voters?

[–] gedhrel@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

The search term you're after is NRS social grade. It's a UK demographics thing.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What the heck are C2de and abc1-households?

[–] gedhrel@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'll try again in reply to the roght comment: "NRS social grade" is a UK demographics thing.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

I didn't know that. Thanks for clarification!

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

At least the Tories like somebody, right?

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago

Animal welfare was actually a field they were quite progressive on, iirc.

[–] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

The age trend makes this graph worthy of uplifting news community (as much as I don't like it).

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 1 points 1 week ago

I'm curious about where they draw the line

Me personally its between dogs and rabbits.