• anlumo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      On ArchLinux, many Electron apps use a central installation of Electron that is kept up to date by the package manager. That works pretty well.

      Of course, snap-based distributions like Ubuntu and other systems without a proper package manager like macOS and Windows can’t do it like that.

      • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s pretty cool. I’m wondering how often this leads to compatibility problems.

        Still, nothing comes close to a native UI experience.

        • anlumo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Still, nothing comes close to a native UI experience.

          That’s not really well defined on Linux. It feels like every application comes with its own toolkit and its own behavior. Even on Windows, there is a mixture of three different generations of Windows UI systems (Windows XP-style, Windows 8-style, Fluent) that are completely different.

    • Skimmer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Have you tried Cromite? Its forked from Bromite by one of the original developers, except kept up to date and actively maintained, plus improved constantly, etc.

      • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Can’t use it as I have a 32bit phone and the dev refuses to provide a 32bit binary (and won’t explain why, referring to some nonexistent past discussion)

        • Spotlight7573@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          https://github.com/uazo/bromite-buildtools/issues/59

          issue poster: if it’s possible for you, to release 32-bit build

          uazo: no, see #41

          https://github.com/uazo/bromite-buildtools/issues/41

          issue poster: can you please also build arm-v7 version of current Bromite?

          uazo: no, sorry. my current build system does not allow this due to an issue in sysbox

          Edit: also:

          https://github.com/uazo/cromite/issues/146

          uazo: sysbox does not support 32-bit applications in 64-bit containers. the build without it works (as I think you did), but my server runs with sysbox.

        • Skimmer@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Ah, that’s unfortunate. Then yeah, I guess your best bet is to stick to a Firefox based browser (that’s my recommendation personally, I use Mull), or if you still need Chromium, I think Brave is the best option atm.

          • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I only use Bromite at this point for some streaming stuff which don’t work so well on FF based browsers, and Mulch always pauses playback when minimised… Bloody annoying. I didn’t want to use Brave, but I guess I might have to try it.

  • madsen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I keep hearing “exploited in the wild”, but does anyone have anything concrete on it — like, IoCs, PoC, victims … anything?