this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
266 points (95.2% liked)

Games

16686 readers
331 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Neato@kbin.social 52 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Isn't this insider trading? If I owned a company and sold all my stock and then tanked my company with stupid news, that'd be illegal.

Though I'm surprised they sold it before the news. This kind of fund-raising tactics piss off customers but investors usually love it, the short-sighted creatures they are.

[–] Hegar@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago

It's obviously insider trader but laws are for the poors.

[–] Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

The guy who owns the company knows what it means for the long term stock price: a plummet. He knows that'll come eventually if these changes go through.

Investors may react positively to the news, but when they see the damage it actually does, they'll pull out too.

The guy running the company has shares that are valued way higher than when he earned them, he is sitting so high right now it's far worth selling here instead of gambling on the response to the news. It's just simple "quit while you're ahead".

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 year ago

"Illegal" doesn't mean much anymore if you're rich. No one seems to be enforcing anything cuz we can't get in the way of that trickle-down.

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 6 points 1 year ago

No it’s not. If he unloaded a huge bunch out of nowhere just before the announcement then sure, it probably is, but that’s not what happened - he has been consistently selling stock the whole year, buying none.

What likely happens is he is paid partly, or was at some stage, in stock. To convert it to cash you need to sell it.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)

record scratch I-I-I-Insider trading!

[–] vlad76@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

We're bored of this business. Let's just suck it dry, let it whither away, and take our money elsewhere.

Customers...? Who?

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Curse spreaders, rich and bored.

[–] zib@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As much as I can't stand John Riccitiello, anyone with RSUs will have vested stocks sold on a fixed schedule to cover taxes. They don't get to choose when or how much is sold as long as they have their RSUs configured as sell to cover. The executives are no different in this regard, except they have a great deal more stocks than the average employee. However, this doesn't absolve them of the awful new pricing structure. That shit should have been walked back before it ever left the planning stages.

[–] Talaraine@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So nobody would ever time such an announcement after such a divestiture.

[–] zib@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

Don't get me wrong, the timing was fucking abysmal. They really should have thought about that ahead of time, but these executives rarely think about anything other than how to line their own pockets.

[–] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So your saying they didn’t time the share sales with respect to the announcement- they timed the announcement with respect to the fixed share sales date.

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago

If you’re selling shares monthly it doesn’t matter when the announcement is, you’re going to have people questioning your sell anyway. They would not have thought about the timing in relation to automated share sells at all because it’s a non issue.

[–] zib@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I'm saying they didn't think about it at all because it's easier to blame users for misunderstanding than take responsibility for anything themselves.

[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

SEC: we don’t see nothing, we don’t hear nothing, we don’t do nothing.

[–] Arcane_Trixster@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's been a day since the announcement, and a few hours since people noticed the stock dump. What the fuck do you want them to do? Fully research the case, send out subpoenas, call hearings, listen to testimony and level fines all in less than 24 hours?

[–] money_loo@1337lemmy.com 6 points 1 year ago

Naw you don’t understand, we’ve been in stocks since GameStop so we’re all experts now, and if we’ve learned anything by trying to play wall streets game, it’s that the game is rigged in wall streets favor.

Dudes right, they won’t do shit, or what they do will by wholly ineffective.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's fucking funny. Lots of faith in their own decisions, huh?