Tofu Rabbit vindicated.

  • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    The artist we’re talking about appears to have (illegally, though no one really cares until you try to do it at scale) translated the game design to a nerf gun for a fan of the game. He wouldn’t have done it for $60 for Bungie.

    • warm@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      No, the nerf gun is sold by Bungie in collaboration with Hasbro. Whoever did the art for the nerf gun, whether in house or contracted, looked online and just stole the artists’, Tofu’s, work. Bungie are compensating them for it, so its a non issue now, but its just another case of art being stolen for official products.

      • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        But the question being asked is about the fact that Tofu’s work is clearly an unauthorized derivative work of Destiny’s original gun.

        The post I was responding to assumed that he had done commissioned work for Bungie, not that he used their art to make a version for a fan.

        • warm@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Oh right yeah, extra confusing in the way I worded that too.

          A guy called Josh commissioned the original art, I don’t know if he was a Bungie employee or not. I was just interested in peoples view of this dynamic. An artist takes money to draw/copy copyright material and then is immediately upset when someone is taking money for their work too. I know it’s not apples to apples, one being a corporation and one being an individual. I was just unsure on where the line is drawn on this kind of stuff as I don’t spend much time in the art communities.