• Goodie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    191
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Honest thoughts: I think fractured communities are what’s causing the issue.

    You end up with the same post on 5 different instances, each with a fraction of the engagement it would get in one place.

    I wonder if some way of federating communities might be a better way, eg, c/photograohy could exist on both lemmy.world and lemm.ee, have submissions and comments from both.

    • And009@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 year ago

      If one of them is down we see half the posts but they should be together and one. Hopefully the mods won’t get a power trip and try to make separate

      • NateNate60@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Make it like a collective: mods can remove their community from a federated collective if they want. Mods can only moderate stuff posted on their community, not in other communities in the collective. But unified rules or just some space for text in a collective will make it seem much nicer and coherent even if it is still a bunch of different communities behind the scenes.

        • Goodie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I dislike that idea. It brings a lot of messyness if the only mod on one server is asleep, etc.

          Im not sure if one god owner of a “federated community” is the right answer. But i do think nods across multiple servers is the right answer? Perhaps giving all individual server community owners equal powers is a good choice?

          Edit: Maybe it’s something server admins could do? “Hey, c/photography, is now an alias for photography@lemm.ee”. Maybe if they decide to unalias it, the local photography becomes a mirror of the remote instance. Then local users could interact as normal, and the remote instance would see incoming users acting as normal remote users?

          • NateNate60@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I think the balance between “sovereign communities”, benevolent (?) dictatorships with one super-admin, or democratic collectives needs to be found. Ultimately this is something that needs to be hammered out, but any solution would be better than none.

            Three possible solutions (just spitballing, not much thought put into them):

            • What I described before as “federated collectives”. New communities can join a collective by asking the others. Maybe there will be a user-weighted vote on this or some other governance mechanism, or maybe it will be consensus-based. Communities can be kicked out of collectives by the same mechanisms or leave on their own. The collective can decide whether mutual mod actions are allowed or not.
            • “Colonial-style” relationships. One “empire” community has powers over other “colony” communities. The empire’s mods can (maybe) perform mod actions on colony communities but not vice versa. Colonies can declare independence or the empire can kick them out. Colonies can join only by asking the empire to accept them.
            • “Roman Republic collectives”: Mods (or active users?) of communities elect a board of prefects for the collective. Prefects (maybe) get mod powers on all communities. The prefects can vote to accept new communities or kick others out. Maybe they can get other management powers too. The “benevolent dictatorship” case is just a special case of Roman Republic where the number of prefects is 1

            Of course, in all cases, an instance refusing to honour the powers of governance authorities would be interpreted as the instance admins withdrawing the community from the collective. Sort of like automatic defederation.

      • Danc4498@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ya’ll are basically talking about how Lemmy works already. You have c/photography on Lemmy.ml. And while you’re logged into Lemmy.world, it’s c/photography@lemmy.ml.

        You subscribe on Lemmy.world and comment on Lemmy.world and everything is synced. If Lemmy.ml is down, you can still see everything and comment from Lemmy.world and itll sync once Lemmy.ml is back online.

        • kiranraine@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean, yea that makes sense but I see a ton of dup communities that don’t seem even remotely synced up…I could be wrong but yea 🤔

          • Danc4498@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you’re talking about communities existing on each instance, ie lemmy.world/c/photography and lemmy.ml/c/photography then yeah, those won’t sync. But the users need to coalesce around once of those, say the lemmy.ml one, then when you go to lemmy.world/c/photography@lemmy.ml. The duplicate communities is no different than Reddit having 2 similar subreddits.

        • Perfide@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s not what they’re talking about, though. What they’re wanting is something that would, for example, combine the feeds for c/photography@lemmy.ml and c/photography@lemmy.world into one collective c/photography.

          • Danc4498@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s just unnecessary, though. The only effect of this is to have numerous separately moderated communities, which sounds like a nightmare to me.

            • Perfide@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              The only effect of this is to have numerous separately moderated communities

              That’s… already the case? c/photography@lemmy.ml and c/photography@lemmy.world, again for example, are already separately moderated communities. The only thing this would change is that instead of subscribing to both individually and seeing their content separately, you could subscribe to a collective c/photography that would show you content from both communities.

        • Goodie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s why i changed my wording part way through to “Alias.” Allowing someone to say, “this name actually refers to an offer server name.”

          This means that the shitty UX of searching for cool communities is marginally better.

    • Danc4498@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the user’s just need to coalesce around a single instance’s community and let the other ones go away. Don’t treat each instance’s version of a community the same. Subscribe to the one that has the most users (or best mods) and let the other ones die.

      It’s no different than reddit having multiple subreddits with similar themes. r/xbox vs r/xboxone for instance. If I’m looking to subscribe to one, I will look at the subreddit with the most users and ignore the other one.

      • theragu40@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is what I do too, but doesn’t it sort of defeat the purpose of the fediverse? Naturally the communities on the largest instances will have the most users. I realize this shouldn’t need to be the case but after several months using lemmy it clearly is the case.

        If everything settles down onto 2-3 monolithic instances, aren’t we just back to a slightly worse reddit?

        • Danc4498@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          2-3 monolithic instances is probably inevitable for general usage. And also, this is 100% better than a single privately controlled corporation.

          There are also niche instances where specific communities may fit better on than the general instances.

          And also, if the 2-3 monolithic instances start fucking around, there are plenty of alternate instances we can migrate to.

        • Danc4498@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, as a Lemmy pioneer, you are a part of the user’s that decides which instance’s community wins. Quit supporting all instance’s versions of the same community. Choose one, and if a different one wins out, switch.

          • Goodie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            So, as a new user to Lemmy: i have to go and hunt down all the cool communities, not just within my own instance (akin to reddit) but across the fediverse?

            That’s some shitty UX. We can do better.

                • JackbyDev@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The only annoying part about it (and believe me, it is certainly annoying) is trying to subscribe to a community that no one on your home instance has subscribed to yet. I don’t think I ever got it to work. The UX of that needs to be improved, definitely. But once your instance has at least one person subscribed to a community your instance “knows” about it and it shows up in the search (and “r/all”, not sure what to call it on Lemmy) just like everything else on your instance.

                  So no, it’s really not all that different except for brand new communities no one on your instance has subscribed to yet.

                • Bo7a@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I think since you are the one who finds it to be shitty UX perhaps you could propose something. And since lemmy is opensource, you can have a look at where the hooks are needed to enable the proposed solution.

            • Danc4498@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s no different than Reddit. You want to follow a hobby on Reddit, you need to find the specific community that is most popular even though there could be thousands.

            • CatWhoMustNotBeNamed@geddit.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Tradeoffs.

              If we want the flexibility of not being beholden to a monolith of mods like reddit, then we have to accept the consequence that anyone can create a community anywhere.

              It’s not hard to search the fediverse, just takes effort to filter. In fact, the great overwhelming volume we get from it is testament to how much better this is than reddit.

              Seems to me you’re tilting at windmills.

              • Goodie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                At what point would that trade of be not worth it?

                Right now in my head, it seems that too many communities are being started, and for most interests there is no clear “winning” community.

    • StandingCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think the better solution would be something like collections that dedup or crosspost them - both pics on lemmy.world and lemm.ee could exist in a collection. For that matter, it would solve the fractured communities as well as the “far too niche communities for such a small userbase” issue. Pics collection could include pics, photography, black&whitepics, etc.

      (I have no idea technically how this would work or even if it could)

      • Goodie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Who would set up, maintain, and police these collections?

        Would the end goal be a collection of every c/photography community across the fediverse in one collection? How would you prevent someone from blogspaming their links to every individual community?

        As with any technical implementation: The tech side is almost always far easier than trying to come up with a “good” or “right” solution.

        • jarfil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Deduping the same post or link is easy. The same image… there are ways. Images modified to look different, that’s where the trouble would start.

        • StandingCat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have no idea, i imagine it would be like a multireddit. The initial creator curates it, but the mods of the communities admin. Copies can be made if you don’t like the original collection, or its been abandoned?

          I would hope a collection would have a bit more deduping/crossposted logic?

          But i could see even having it so you can post to a collection- but before posting, it asks you which community fits best (ranks similar names by subscribers) this way you post to the most popular one. This should naturally make the user base gravitate to one or another.

        • CatWhoMustNotBeNamed@geddit.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Couldn’t we do collections within an app on a per-user basis?

          Like I could create a collection of different communities that I see as having some commonality, then it’s only a view for me.

          But I’m no dev, so take that into consideration.

          • Goodie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I might be a dev, but I’m dev enough to understand it’s actually about communication and understanding the problem and not writing code. Writing code is pretty easy by comparison.

            I think collections are a good and useful feature on their own merit, I’m not sure if they’ll solve the fragmented communities issue.

            If my problem is that a single article is being posted to 5 different photography community, and each with 2 comments, well, now I can see them together, but people are still not talking to each other. Social media platforms live and die by users talking to each other IMO.

            • CatWhoMustNotBeNamed@geddit.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Good points/explanation about the fragmentation breaking the communication.

              Hmm, not sure if we can take any active position toward “fixing”, since it’s really hard to predict the outcome of our actions. Perhaps this is something that will continue to mature as communities coalesce.

              I think I’d still like the ability to build my own in-app filters that aggregate communities. Like you’d do with a podcast app. Then at least (for an individual) you’d see all the posts that you consider related in a single feed/folder/view.

              It’s definitely not a simple problem.

  • Magnor@lemmy.magnor.ovh
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think this is unpopular. Well, at least I hope it is not. Those bots are horrendous.

    • jarfil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Have you tried blocking them?

      What seems to be popular is the inability of people to use basic Lemmy functions… not sure if because of UI discoverability, or because they really want some algorithm to feed them clickbait mush.

      • Magnor@lemmy.magnor.ovh
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I have. I actually defederated my instance from lemmit. But many users do not have that option, and user blocking can be tedious if the offending bots are many.

        So you could say I am quite aware of Lemmy’s basic functions, yes.

        • jarfil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          If I’m not mistaken, lemmit has a single bot account, easy for anyone to block… and I haven’t seen anyone else running similar bots.

          So what is all this even about?

          • Antik 👾@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            On Lemmy World we banned a lot of those bots since they are spammy and often post in communities where they are the only user so there is no moderation. So that’s most likely the reason why it’s not an issue for you.

            • jarfil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Oh… that makes sense.

              I keep a lemmy.ee account just to subscribe to bot populated communities. I also don’t get “spammed”, since I only check the Subscribed feed on there, but All looks like a mess.

              One of the n-th things I miss on Lemmy, is creating custom feeds without having to jump instances. And for admins to be able to decide what goes into their All.

        • jarfil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Which app? Seems to work fine for me in Jerboa, Liftoff and Sync. Blocking all bots in Lemmy’s account settings seems to work too.

  • Polar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Fragmented communities are.

    My front page has the same thing 10-15 times because they were cross posted to so many different instances.

    I’ve reduced my Lemmy usage by probably 95% because of it. I scroll so much but get nowhere.

    No matter what my sort options are.

    Edit: which aren’t always bots, unfortunately. A ton of people see them from other communities and will post the same thing to theirs. Blocking bots does not help.

      • Polar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s all over my front page. Even the few that I am subscribed to, I kinda need to be because of the fragmentation. There are 3 main Android communities. If I only pick one, I miss news, but if I pick all 3, I get a ton of duplicate news.

        Lemmy is flawed. They need to publish an update where Lemmy condenses these posts into one post with a drop down where you can open and choose which instance you want to view it from. Shouldn’t be hard, and to prevent any issues, allow the user to condense a certain time period. For example, allow me to condense all posts that are the same URL that were posted in the past 6 or 24 hours. Make the most popular post the “main” one, and have a drop down to view the other ones.

        I know it’s possible because I used to have an extension to check if any URL I was currently on was posted to Reddit, and if it was, show me every single instance of it. It was useful to see exactly where the news article I was viewing was posted on, or the YouTube video, etc.

        I had very high hopes for Lemmy, but the fact I’ve been here for a month before the Reddit API changes, I have seen the clusterfuck that Lemmy has become. There’s no way new users are going to even sign up when the front page is repost city.

        • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The way i see it is that it is okay to miss some things. I only sub to one android community (lemdroid), one tech community (lemmy world), one privacy community, etc. I am okay with possibly missing the first post about a thing because of this. It helps a lot. Another thing i do is use thunder to sort by “top today” once a day on the all feed to see what everyone thinks is important.

          • Polar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Unrelated, but I don’t sub to lemdroid because it’s run by the same toxic moderators of the subreddit.

            Just thought that might be useful info for anyone who didn’t know.

          • theragu40@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            This works for the individual (as long as they concede to knowing missing content). But if everyone does this it kinda destroys lemmy because you never get the critical mass of users in any one community to have meaningful discussion.

            Which highlights the issue of your proposal for me, that I’m not concerned about missing “content” in the form of links. I don’t like missing out on conversations. But when they are fragmented as they are now with so few people in each, discussion ends up quite limited as well. If people just silence one or more “duplicate” communities to reduce the issue of repeat content then it ensures discussions remain fragmented as well.

            • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I think one community becomes the dominate like on reddit and others offshoot due to mod differences, community rules, etc. As an example, i am not sure if anxdroid lemdroid is the largest community, but it is run by the r/android mods and i see no issue with how its run so that is the one i sub to. If i ever began to dislike it i might move to android lemmy ml or something.

              • CatWhoMustNotBeNamed@geddit.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Hopefully we see it mature this way, and eventually we some primary communities (per subject), with some smaller communities, and the tiny ones just being subsumed by the others.

        • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          As the top mod of one of these Android communities, our comm on LW usually isn’t super heavy on the news front and I feel our content is generally pretty different than the others, and duplicate news posts happens pretty rarely.

    • ShittyRedditWasBetter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nailed it.

      That and this place being crazy crazy overwhelmingly progressive (not shade) is going to push people away. Seeing 4 or 5 of the same tankie posts in a row with little other content but politics is going to ensure nobody is able to find more sharable content.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Communists and socialists are not progressive. Progressivism is a liberal ideology.

        • ShittyRedditWasBetter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          .World

          And yes, I know you can switch. Nobody outside of the most hardcore are going to deal with multiple instances, moving identity, etc.

          If the situation doesn’t get better regarding how that works, either through community or tech, I’ll move back to Reddit eventually as will most of the folks who jumped on after the failed protest.

      • Nahvi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        this place being crazy crazy overwhelmingly progressive (not shade) is going to push people away.

        This is a serious concern. As a moderate, I usually get fed-up with how lop-sided it is here pretty quickly.

        When I first joined Lemmy, I was optimistic that there would be a good exchange of ideas and open discussions from differing viewpoints. Unfortunately, that only lasted until I found the Agora. At which point I realized I had just joined Survivor Lemmy, and was always wondering which instance was going to get voted off the island this week. I pretty much dropped my sh.itjust.works account after that.

        It is amazing how toxic the environment can be towards people with differing political views. I can’t remember the last time I was here and didn’t see someone calling conservatives fascists or saying they should die. Also, it is pretty rare day when I see someone use the word communist here instead of the pejorative “tankie”. Definitely not the kind of environment to foster inclusion.

        If there wasn’t such an emphasis on civility, anti-racism, anti-bigotry, and non-toxicity here then I wouldn’t expect anything and probably wouldn’t even notice, but with that emphasis it seems to stand out even more.

    • WashedOver@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      To be honest I’ve been a little confused on the various posts just being links back to Reddit. Not sure what the benefit is for the poster?

    • CoderKat@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Whenever I see the same person reposting like that, I downvote all but whatever seems the highest voted or post in the most specific community. Reducing such spam is one of the values of the downvote IMO. Though unfortunately depending on where the community is hosted, the downvoting may or may not actually work.

      I see it as little different from downvoting someone posting the same comment in a thread. They’re simply not contributing to making the site better and in fact are actively making it worse. I don’t mind a single cross post so that they can use both a smaller community and a bigger, more general one, but take issue when they’re posting to a dozen big communities (especially ones that most people are likely subscribed to anyway). To anyone who does this, I wag my finger at you.

    • Nahvi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      As I understand it, seeing the same post multiple times when it is cross-posted is an app issue. The default desktop UI combines them all into one post with links near the top showing the other communities it was cross-posted to.

      I never see the multiple post thing you are talking about.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah. We need conversations here. We need to generate our own content. Sometimes the reposting bots give us something to talk about, but I think 90% of them don’t get any conversation going.

  • NewBrainWhoThis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Not just Reddit bots… “There is a discussion on [Reddit, Hacker News, etc…] but feel free to comment here as well.” (⁠╯⁠°⁠□⁠°⁠)⁠╯⁠︵⁠ ⁠┻⁠━⁠┻

  • eatham 🇭🇲@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Your opinion is not unpopular, everyone wants these dumb repost/article bots that post the same link in 15 communities gone.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, initially I thought it would be a good idea to kick-start discussion for certain communities, but in practice nobody comments on those posts.

      I ended up blocking the bots too.

      • sparklingsquirrel@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The reason I personally don’t comment on those bot posts is because there’s no real OP that might be interested in my answer/opinion so I think “Why even bother?”.

      • CoderKat@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Blocking works really well cause there’s so few of them. I’ve only blocked a single one (months ago) and haven’t had any bot spam of the level of disliked. I still do see some from humans, but most of the time that’s people trying to populate a smaller community where they’re basically the only poster so far. There isn’t really any other good options to jump start most communities, since people tend to not post (or even know about) new communities until they’re active.

      • init@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If we’re being fair, I’m just parroting the exact same line that gets repeated whenever any unpopularopinion is actually pretty popular.

        The unpopular opinion would be: due to having a far lower user base than reddit, bots fill a unique and necessary role on Lemmy that would be a thankless task for an actual user.

        I’m witholding judgement, but I do think I’ve seen the same articles posted in several fediverse and it is getting old.

  • Hoomod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    To some extent they can be useful

    But yeah, I don’t need a one to one of reddit, if I wanted that I’d just be on reddit

  • p000l@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    With you. All these single upvote posts with 0 comments. Ban them!

    All new post views are full of them.

  • willya@lemmyf.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not unpopular at all, I personally think the weird political crap I never came across on Reddit is keeping people away more than anything. Never seen terms like “tankie” until I came here.

    • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Probably didn’t see a lot of tankies themselves until you came here either, but lemmygrad and hexbear are where they live.

      Mentions of them are abundant here because they are abundant here themselves and annoy everyone else.

      • credit crazy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fr just the other day I came across a lemmygrad post asking if they should try one way defederations so lemmygrad posts can show up on other instances but non lemmygrad posts can’t show up to lemmygrad users and most of the post was basically just “we need to show everyone how good communism is while purifying our views” yea lemmygrads really are ignorant and just want to be a minor annoyance to the rest of us

      • willya@lemmyf.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I still don’t even know what a tankie is. It sounds extremely ignorant like referring to sex as hanky panky.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          A tankie came from people who defended the tanks in the infamous picture of that guy stand in front of a long line of tanks.

          Those people claim to be communist and that China is awesome.

          They’re lying about both tho. Their far right authortians, and far right authortians love nothing more than pretending to be anything except who they are.

        • SoleInvictus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They’re referring to communists. Originally the term was a slur for communists who approve of one-party communist regimes that are associated with Marxism–Leninism.

          Since the Reddit diaspora, I’ve seen it applied to communists, socialists, anyone who has expressed any criticism of capitalism, and users that others dislike. I think it’s turning into how Americans use “communist” as a pejorative: they don’t know what the word actually means, it’s now just a word for things they don’t like.

          • CatWhoMustNotBeNamed@geddit.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The communist pejorative has been dead for… Decades and decades. Like 4, at least. By the 80’s it had lost its charm, and young adults would roll their eyes when gramps used it.

            There are plenty of other similar, (now-meaningless) pejoratives tossed about all the time. It’s old and tiresome to hear/see.

            I’ve searched before, do you know why “tankie”? I can’t get a good etymology on it, like how it would reference single-party communist states?

            Edit: hmm, Guess I missed the Wikipedia entry on it, though I could swear I’d read it before. Thanks Habiscus!

              • CatWhoMustNotBeNamed@geddit.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                From the US. Communist was tired 40 years ago. I saw it first hand, by the 70’s kids were already getting tired of it, by the 80’s the next generation just said “sure gramps”.

                Yea, you still hear it a little today, but nothing like it used to be.

    • SasquatchBanana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lemmy has a significant amount of tankies which is why you come across that term and politics associated with them. It is the same way you come across conservatives on Facebook or reddit, and Nazis on Twitter. If you use any platform you will come across political groups in some shape and form.

    • cubedsteaks@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Never seen terms like “tankie” until I came here

      I mentioned this once and then someone became super unhinged at me.

      I mentioned that someone became super unhinged at me and that person seemed okay at first but then started talking down to me about politics in general.

      It’s fucking weird here sometimes and I couldn’t be further removed from anything “tankie” related but random lemmy users will still screech it at me.

      • cubedsteaks@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tankie is a pejorative label generally applied to communists who express support for one-party communist regimes that are associated with Marxism–Leninism, whether contemporary or historical. It is commonly used by anti-authoritarian leftists, including anarchists, libertarian socialists, left communists, democratic socialists, and reformists to criticise Leninism, although the term has seen increasing use by liberals and right‐wing factions as well.

        this is what I’ve been going by cause I had to look it up as no one can be confirmed to give a straight forward answer on here that I’ve seen.

        • The common internet usage is simply communists who are willing to roll in the tanks. They’re accepting of a violent upheaval culminating in communism, which just sounds incredibly naive, personally.

  • Astroturfed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’re just aggravating. If I accidently click one I just regret it. There’s never any comments, I don’t want to click one and generate traffic elsewhere. It’s not just the reddit ones either. There’s a few other repost bots that direct elsewhere. They’re all bad.

  • noodle@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    I said this was a bad idea when we first moved here. Nobody wants to interact with a bot. Especially if it is a discussion that involves the OP… people realise the conversation is taking place on Reddit and go back there.