Leaker yeux1122 says that Apple Store staff have been told to make sure iPhone 15 buyers know about the change…

  • Cabrio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Apple is trying to claim it’s the fault of regulators that usb-c to lightning cables will be useless e-waste despite being the wankers that chose to use lightning instead of usb-c in the first place.

    • anteaters@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s good that regulators put a stop to Apple producing even more proprietary BS cables then.

      • Cabrio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        48
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        But not USB as a standard it doesn’t. They still chose proprietary over standard because wankers.

            • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              Other than, you know, the connector. The thing most people care about. Most USB-C cables today are usb 2.0 still anyway so they have the same spec as Lightning.

              Micro usb was non reversible, the little pins broke all the fuckin time so the cable wouldn’t stay in the port, and the connector would damage the port itself so you’d just be fucked.

              Lightning was miles ahead of that. It was reversible so it literally didn’t matter how you put it in. There were no fragile little pins to hold it in so it lasted a lot longer, and since the internal pins in the port were all on the sides of the port it was a lot harder to damage the port itself. If the cable got damaged you could just replace it without worrying about the port.

              Lightning was better than micro and mini usb in pretty much every way.

              • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                There were no fragile little pins to hold it in so it lasted a lot longer

                …except Apple made the housing and cable super fragile so they’d sell more “certified” cables. Phew, dodged a bullet there. Any excuse Apple ever made about Lightning falls on its face when you figure out how two-faced they are.

                Sad thing is that I actually liked Lightning cables, a lot, but I liked them when they were made by decent manufacturers with braided cord and a sturdy connector.

              • stonedemoman@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Lightning cables are notorious for breaking. https://you-well.co.uk/why-apple-cables-break-so-easily-what-to-do/

                So what is there left to say about it…that you don’t have to look at the port before plugging a lightning cable in? Is that your justification for saying the USB standard sucked?

                Most USB-C cables today are usb 2.0 still anyway so they have the same spec as Lightning.

                Modern PCs have 3.0 ports. Androids have 3.0 ports. 3.0 cables are available at any online store. What the actual fuck are you talking about?

                • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  11
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You’re the first person I’ve ever heard defend micro usb lol. So congratulations there.

                  Yes Apple branded lightning cables break pretty easily. Not the fucking port in the phone though. Way to ignore that.

                  “Android” isn’t a single maker. Sure galaxies and pixels are USB3.0 or 3.1. The vast majority of cheapo Android phones use 2.0.

                  • stonedemoman@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    9
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Not the fucking port in the phone though. Way to ignore that.

                    I’m skeptical that this happens anywhere remotely near frequently enough to condemn the entire technology. Never seen it, and never heard about it until just now.

                    “Android” isn’t a single maker. Sure galaxies and pixels are USB3.0 or 3.1. The vast majority of cheapo Android phones use 2.0.

                    I would love for you to find a single noteworthy android manufacturer that is not in this list. *Edited because this link was not working correctly on desktop site

          • Cabrio@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            30
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yep, the e-waste conversation is bullshit apple propaganda because they aren’t happy about playing nice with competitors and losing proprietary control of their connectors despite it being the same e-waste as if they were upgrading from or to any other standard.

            • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Eh, at the time they went with proprietary over micro usb to have a reversible port that could push more wattage. I feel like they’ve been dragging their feet because consumers hate changing to new cable standards. I remember the complaints when they moved away from the 30-pin to lightning. They’ve been putting USB C on devices for years now.

              • Neato@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                I remember the complaints when they moved away from the 40-pin to lightning.

                Are apple consumers more prone to this complaint than the rest of us? Since I’ve had cell phones I’ve moved from USB-mini to USB-micro to USB-C. Every time it was a better change. This is just as many as apple is being asked to do except now they get to benefit from all of the 3rd party cable manufacturers.

                • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I think most tech-illiterate consumers are iPhone users. That’s been my experience in the US at least. If I started talking cable wattage or data transfer speeds to my aunts and uncles they would immediately glaze over.

              • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                at the time they went with proprietary over micro usb to have a reversible port that could push more wattage.

                They only came with 5W chargers from the early models up to the iPhone 11 in 2019.

                • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yeah, but Apple was planning on using the port for years, which they have. iPhone 8 was the first to support faster charging in 2017.

      • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was a bit skeptical of your statement, because it FELT like they came out at the same time; but you are completely correct. The iPhone 5 with lightning was released Sep 2012, and the USB-C standard was published in Aug 2014. Almost exactly 2 years later. The first smartphone with USB-C didn’t come out until a full year later, though. So lightning was more like 3 years ahead in the phone world.

      • eskimofry@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Two years is like no time in the land of technology standards. Apple did not know whats going to happen in 2 years? Come on!

        • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          They weren’t going to keep a huge 30 pin connector for two extra iPhone models or spend two years on microusb just to quickly switch to usb-c. And I think they went with the 40-pin over micro-usb as they already had a base of consumers with those cables from the success of iPods. If Wikipedia is correct micro usb was only announced six months prior to the original iPhone.