• Martineski@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I will be stepping down in ~7-14 days any suggestions on how to find someone that could take care of this community better than me? Thank you.

  • thejml@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Incase anyone wanted to know the timeline:

    Tesla was incorporated in July 2003 by Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning as Tesla Motors. The company’s name is a tribute to inventor and electrical engineer . In February 2004, via a $6.5 million investment, Elon Musk became the company’s largest shareholder. He became CEO in 2008.

    • jagged@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s some irony that a company named after an overlooked inventor was founded by two overlooked inventors…

    • dan1101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      $6.5 million

      For $6.5 million he became CEO of what became an $800 billion dollar company? That’s not bad.

  • Lemmylaugh@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    In June 2009, Eberhard brought a lawsuit against Elon Musk for libel, slander, and breach of contract, alleging that Musk pushed him out of the company, publicly disparaged him, and compromised Tesla’s financial health.[16] In August 2009, Eberhard dropped the lawsuit for undisclosed reasons

  • 𝐘Ⓞz҉@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hate elon as well but I have to give it to him, not everyone with money can scale a company like he did. People say elon’s dad was rich and he bought all the companies, this might be true but there are many people with rich dad’s but not everyone can take a company to a level where Tesla, spacex and others are.

    • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re saying that like he scaled it with profits. This is all taxpayer money and grifting.

      Tesla exploded during the start of EVs, and has only devalued since. SpaceX is run by crazy engineers, not Musk, and is all paid for by taxpayers and carbon offsets.

      Twitter is an example of a company where Musk is left at the helm, alone.

    • Noughmad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This is all true:

      Not everyone with money could build two huge successful companies (and let’s face it, while he didn’t found Tesla, the company wouldn’t be this successful without him).

      Someone without money (as in, at least multiple millions) could never do this, no matter how talented.

      Elon Musk has repeatedly beaten the odds when everyone was telling him that it’s impossible or stupid. He did this at least 3 times. But this breaks a man. He starts to think that every idea of his is a good one, especially when everyone else is telling him it’s stupid. A good example is George Lucas, prequels and sequels were the way they were because he didn’t have to listen to anyone, so he didn’t.

  • DFTBA_FTW@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    There are a lot of reasons to dislike Musk, this is not one of them.

    When Elon came on board Tesla their business plan was to buy existing super cars and an existing electric drive train and then convert the super cars.

    This was all going to be done by hand in a workshop. They would do dozens of cars a year.

    Without Elon that’s what they would be doing, he was behind the transition to building their own vehicles on their production lines and volumes comparable to normal manufacturers.

    That’s why he won his lawsuit to be listed as a founder.

    • toasteranimation@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The reason to dislike him in this instance is that he takes ALL the credit for the company’s success, never mentioning these two or Tesla’s beginnings

      • awsamation@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        By the sounds of it all they brought to it was the name and maybe some technical knowhow. Because everything else about their business seems to have been abandoned. The only way to get further off from “we’ll make electric conversions with preexisting parts” is to abandon electric cars as a whole.

        He may not deserve all of the credit, but it sounds like he deserves something north of 90% of it.

    • Xeelee@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      On top of that, they’re both very rich now because of Tesla’s success. There’s really no reason to pity these guys.

    • foobaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, that’s not how it went down. Watch this interview with them: https://youtu.be/eblPwXFb7TE

      They had the full plan laid out (start with expensive sports cars, then step by step move into mass market) and got Musk involved using it as a proposal.

  • Tammo-Korsai@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Muskrat just takes the credit and drums up some hype. I wonder what his newest unfeasible project will be? I bet it’s something safe and reliable!

    • elskertesla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Musk has consistently proven himself to be a driving force behind the sustained success of every company under his leadership. Disparaging attitudes towards Elon seem to follow popular opinion rather than fact. While there’s plenty of justifiable criticism, the points frequently echoed here don’t contribute meaningfully to constructive discourse.

      Edit: The prevalence of downvotes simply underscores my argument. How does this platform distinguish itself from Reddit, when it harbors a similar degree of negativity and concerted downvoting targeted at individuals participating in earnest conversation?

      • Feweroptions@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Salty Elon anti-simps are everywhere and will always downvote things. That isn’t really this platform’s fault.

        Big differences between reddit and here are:

        • The points don’t matter (and the rules are made up)
        • You don’t get banned from communities for wrongthink
        • Fuck u/spez

        Those are all great reasons for using Lemmy instead. Oh, plus the relative privacy.

      • mikeboltonshair@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly though who gives a shit about Musk though? Do you personally admire him? He’s a rich guy that is good at managing, if that’s something to admire then I understand your comment, otherwise it’s just ball riding

            • elskertesla@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t admire his tweets or latest shenanigans, but I do admire his work in engineering and AI. In those specific fields, he is quite the visionary, knowing how to position the right people in the right places with a clear future goal in mind. More often than not, his foresight proves accurate. Specific examples of the engineering decisions and designs manifested in SpaceX or Tesla include innovations such as the Octovalve, Gigacasting, FSD computer, the reusability of Falcon 9 with landings, Merlin and Raptor rocket engines, and the general software architecture in Tesla cars. The list goes on for technology enthusiasts like me.

              You don’t have to appreciate everything about him — I certainly don’t — but as someone who loves technology, I can’t help but recognize how his vision has propelled America further into the future.

              Part of me wishes he had delved into nuclear science to solve fusion instead of purchasing Twitter. Perhaps, though, he’s past his prime.

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You’re mistaking deserved scorn and ridicule for hate, a common tactic amongst people trying to defend ridiculous people.

        • Hawke@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          good at managing

          About that, have you seen twitter lately?

          It seems like his best management decisions have been to not touch anything.

    • pumpsnabben@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      He was and still is the largest contributor of funds when OpenAI was founded, he is also one of the founders.

      This is not to say that OpenAI wouldn’t exist without him but he did contribute massively to its economy.

      • Martineski@lemmy.fmhy.mlM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh, I’m not discrediting him. I’m just pointing out that he gives all the credit to himself like he always does with everything he touches.