this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
53 points (92.1% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35726 readers
1342 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Saw that there's a Firefox browser named Mull for Android in this thread. I went to check it out in the Play Store, but saw it's not there. Apparently, it's one of those that have to be side loaded. I use stock Android and Firefox, btw.

  • What's Mull about?
  • Why would someone use it over Firefox?
  • What are it's benefits and disadvantages?
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Mull is a browser for android. You can download it from https://f-droid.org/packages/us.spotco.fennec_dos/.

Its hardened Firefox with some good privacy features turned on. I use it on a daily basis.

[–] ace_garp@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

FFUpdater from F-Droid, is a clean way to automatically check for and download updates for Mull and other modified browsers.

[–] pop@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Mull already is part of a separate F-droid repo by divestOS developers. No need for yet another installer.

[–] ace_garp@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Good to know. Thanks

[–] ace_garp@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Thanks for your comment. I was using FFUpdater for Mulch and Mull browsers.

Looks like Mull is now added to the main Fdroid repo. I've switched to that one for Mull.

[–] chottomatte@lemdro.id 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)
  • It's a Firefox fork with focus on security
  • The equivalent of Librewolf on Android
  • clearly... people use it for security reasons
  • The good thing about it is clearly security , but its focus on privacy comes at the expense of speed ... which is its main disadvantage in my experience
[–] cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 months ago

Yeah the refresh rate is limited to 60fps on the app.

Loads of good answers to your question that I don't need to add to.

I just thought I'd give fdroid a shout out.

It's an alternative app store focused on FOSS. That's where you'll find mull, and a bunch of other great apps.

You do need to give it permission to install apps but I've never thought of it as side loading.

[–] Asudox@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Mull is a hardened fork of Firefox. I use it but some rare websites' functionality does not work with it. Mull is not more secure than Chromium though, even if it is hardened. Chromium is undoubtedly more secure but not privacy-friendly. I also don't want to support the chromium monopoly, so I don't use them. Brave as a browser also sucks. Shields suck. Nothing to this day has been better than uBlock Origin yet.

[–] Bienenvolk@feddit.org 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why do you claim Chromium is more secure than Firefox based browsers? Where there any security issues Firefox had but Chromium didn't? Bugs in sandboxing?

[–] Asudox@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Firefox's sandboxing sucks ass (especially on Linux). Mozilla has still not implemented a better sandbox, despite the open discussion since years. GrapheneOS (a security and privacy focused aosp rom) uses Chromium for its browser Vanadium because it ultimately is undoubtedly more secure. Google pumps millions into their chrome security team.

So while not that good for privacy, chrome/chromium is better for security.

[–] Bienenvolk@feddit.org 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Firstly, sandboxing is a part of layers of layers of security mechanisms. You cannot tell the overall security by just looking on it. In recent years, a lot has changed in Firefox' sandbox. I don't know if it cached up, but I'd guess it has become quite a good sandbox by now.

What is more important for me, however, is the discrepancy in zero days. Chromium just had more in the past. That may be due to the gap on market share and therefore interest of "hackers" but it shows that you can't just claim that Firefox "sucks ass" and Chromium is safer.

I think there is just a lot of opinion in the internet regarding this topic while not a lot of information.

E: my intention was not to attack you. Security is a complex topic. I just couldn't verify your claim that Chromium would be "undoubtedly" better.

[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 2 points 2 months ago
  • it's a fork focused on privacy and security

You'd use it if that's important to you.

[–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 months ago

For GrapheneOS, is there any reason to use anything but Vanadium?

[–] LunchMoneyThief@links.hackliberty.org -2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Tor Browser that is configured to use a VPN as it's networking layer rather than the Tor network.

Also a good opportunity for them to catch a few sales for their own particular VPN service.

And if you don't really care for VPNs, it is Firefox with the Arkenfox user.js template applied, in addition to some compile time flags disabling things like Mozilla's telemetry reporting (even though this is already disabled by the user.js template).

[–] SirSoySauce@lemm.ee 11 points 2 months ago

I guess you mean Mullvad Browser? Mull is an Android Firefox fork with some hardening. You can read what they have done here: https://divestos.org/pages/our_apps#mull

[–] Asudox@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Mull is not made by Mullvad. Mull is made by the dev of DivestOS.

I genuinely thought it was slang for Mullvad. Thanks, I stand corrected.

[–] Mikina@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

On the topic of Mullvad, what made me choose Kullvad over LibreWolf was the VPN being bundled in. If I'm not mistaken, the whole point of ToR browser is that you have exactly the same fingerprint as any other Tor browser user, making it a lot harder to distinguish you from others using your extensions, browser and other minor stuff your browser reports about you, that combined makes for a pretty unique fingerprint, evej of you are using a VPN.

But, if you have a browser that has the same fingerprint for all users, and it has an accompanying VPN, you can partly expect that most of other users of the same VPN will also be using the same browser, making it a lot harder to track you - because while there may be only a few thousands users of Mullvad in the wild, which renders the same fingerprint not much of an advantage (because you would be one of the few users of i.e Proton VPN with Mullvad), if you also use Mullvad VPN, it's probable that most of other users who share your Mullvad VPN IP are also Mullvad browser users, making it easier to blend in.

Bit that's mostly my theory, why (along with being able to pay with Monero) I feel like the combo of Mullvad browser and VPN is the best combination as far as minimizing fingerprint is considered. If someone has more knowledge about the issue, I'd love to hear some counter-arguments or tips how to improve my setup.