• Maharashtra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Haven’t you ever seen a person whose opinions were backed by actual research, that was nevertheless wrong?

    Haven’t you ever seen a person whose opinions weren’t backed by in-depth research, who was still correct?

    • Yulia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      While it happens, there’s absolutely zero guarantee you’re one of those who are correct without research

      • Maharashtra@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Great things were achieved with zero guarantees.

        And great many deal of people achieved nothing wasting their fortunes on 100% guaranteed deals.

        • Yulia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m asking again, why do you think your theory is more correct than current scientific consensus? Convince me as if I am an investor

          • Maharashtra@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m asking again, why do you think your theory is more correct than current scientific consensus?

            I don’t recall any theory being suggested here. Words do have their meanings and definitions - theory is no exception here.

            Convince me as if I am an investor

            You don’t struck me as trustworthy person. There are plenty of “wrongs” about your mindset. Too many to convince me that you’re talking real money.

            Now, since all this discussion consists of you shooting blindly with flawed assumptions and me trying to get you out of binary B&W mindset, to no avail, and I grow bored of it - would that be all?