this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
85 points (98.9% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6608 readers
566 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Reproduced here for easier amusement:

1/ Russia's space agency Roskosmos is reportedly evaluating options for using space rockets to drop aerial bombs on Ukraine from orbit. The proposal is likely to face serious technical difficulties, not least the risk of bombs burning up from the heat of atmospheric reentry.

2/ The Russian BRIEF Telegram channel reports that former Roscosmos head Dmitry Rogozin has been discussing the proposal with Dmitry Baranov, director general of the Progress Rocket Space Centre, before taking it to Vladimir Putin last week.

Rogozin reportedly envisages using Russia's Vostochny and Plesetsk cosmodromes to launch bomb-carrying rockets into space to drop "heavy FABs" (presumably the FAB-500 500-kilogram (1,100 lb) general purpose air-dropped bomb) on "NATO equipment" in Ukraine.

3/ Baranov, understandably, has questions. According to BRIEF, he objected that the bombs would overheat on the way down. "It's travelling at over 6 kilometres per second. That's practically space speed. It's like the Soyuz TMA [spacecraft] coming back. It's the same shit."

4/ According to Baranov, rockets launched from Vostochny can carry 7.5 tons, while launches from Plesetsk can carry 10 tons, minus a ton in each case for "insurance". He is said to envisage a 6-9 month timeframe for adapting the rockets into bombers, though he seems to be uncertain about how this can be done. Rogozin reportedly envisages adapting "the toys of the Moscow Institute of Thermal Engineering" to shield the FABs from reentry heat.

5/ BRIEF reports that Rogozin planned to send a paper to Anton Vaino, Putin's chief of staff, who is said to be interested and intending to "report to the chief on this matter". It's not known what Putin himself thinks of the idea

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] SpicyPeaSoup@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

Silly westoid, glorious russia had infinite money from gas. (Please ignore russia's non-existent civilian infrastructure)

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is incredibly small brained, but, hey, whatever gets these guys to throw away more of their resources!

Uh, I mean, you guys should definitely do this. It's a flawless idea.

[–] TauZero@mander.xyz 12 points 1 year ago

Yes, genius idea! Please dedicate as much of your national industrial capacity as possible towards manufacturing these miracle weapons!

[–] skillissuer@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

ah yes, this comes from rogozhin, that genius who threw a bday party within ukrainian artillery range

now it makes sense

[–] verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

His ass is full of metal, it's now a sophisticated radar array on par with that of NORAD. He is...the Six Million Ruble Ass Man......cue "a team" movie theme

[–] Shurimal@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago

Aren't FABs primitive iron bombs (unguided)? The accuracy of this will be ±200 km, extrapolating from the fact that WWII bombers operating from 7 or 8 km altitude could only reliably hit city-sized targets (and my own experiments with unguided bombing in DCS). The russians will be lucky to hit the right country.

And extrapolating from my experience in a mortar crew, the russkies will have an "oops" moment or two when they overshoot the target by about 6000 km🙃

[–] dilligasatall@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How much weed are these guys smoking? I'm surprised they haven't "reinvented" the trebuchet at this point.

[–] fist_of_fartitude@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A trebuchet would be a better solution, tbh.

[–] damnYouSun@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At the very least it decreases the possibility they'll accidentally hit the wrong country and start world war III.

The inaccuracy on this is so high that they might accidentally hit Antarctica.

Watch them fuck up so bad they hit the Russian embassy in Beijing.

[–] skillissuer@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

at this point weed is gotta be sanctioned and they had to be smoking datura instead

[–] professor@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The only certainty is that it is going to blow up a Chinese consulate somewhere somehow.

[–] damnYouSun@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Perhaps the bombs can clear out some of the Chinese booster on the way down?

[–] Creyapnilla@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Yeah, can't do Rods from God with missiles or bombs. Kinda need the Tungsten rods, it's in the freaking name 😂

[–] _Z1useri@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, it's Wunderwaffenzeit. Maybe we can interest them in some battleships on tracks, intercontinental artillery, bomber Blimps or an iceberg-aircraft-carrier (it's still going to catch fire somehow).

I expect to see Rogozin strapped to one of these babies, providing terminal guidance, like Gravity's Rainbow made real (and shitty).

[–] atlasraven31@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

I'm not even sure they could hit the Earth with an asteroid, much less a target country.

[–] skillissuer@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

russians haven't even bothered to research insensitive explosives

na comrad fab-500 is fine, please ignore production date (1972)