• ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    3 months ago

    Only in intelligent measuring systems.

    But of course we’re talking about America here, so intelligence is out of the question.

    • jmiller@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Metric measuring systems are superior in almost every use case, with the exception, I think, of how temperature feels to us. As arbitrary as Fahrenheit seems, it does seem like a more natural scale to talk about the weather or body temp. The smaller units are nice for these purposes too. 0 being very cold and 100 being very hot feels less arbitrary than -18 and 38, even if celcius is more logical and easier to use for many other things.

      • ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Arbitrary feeling is arbitrary on it’s own. I suspect it depends on what you have experienced the most in life (ie, what you grew up with). People growing up with Celsius likely feel the same as people growing up with Fahrenheit, that the other measure doesn’t make much sense and they can just equate what “hot” or “cold” is off a number.

        • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          I can’t believe people cared enough to downvote this. People are more comfortable with what they grew up with, what a novel idea. No no, the only system that makes sense is the one that puts 0 at too cold to be comfortable (for some people) and 100 to too warm to be comfortable (for some people). So let me ask this instead. Why 0 to 100? Why not 0 to 144? Why not 0 to 180? Why not 0 to 90? These all have their value, and would have been preferred in various cultures, because that’s what was familiar to them. The range is no less (or more) arbitrary than the markers used to divide it.