this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
110 points (98.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

9596 readers
935 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/17528988

Guided bus

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zadhu@slrpnk.net 30 points 3 months ago

Theyre from Adelaide and they call it the O-Bahn.

Idiots occasionally drive their cars onto the track entrances near the city.

[–] Meron35@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Dude looks so done

[–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 2 points 3 months ago

Not like that.

[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

How are they different from streetcars?

[–] mecfs@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They can also be used on non-guided tracks — ie. vehicles cleared to work on roads too with a driver. More versatile.

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Jack of all trades, master of none.

[–] Oddbin@lemm.ee 16 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Is oftentimes better than a master of one.

People always miss that bit out.

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 5 points 3 months ago

Likely due to the phrase being added to over time.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_of_all_trades

Another version is: "Jack of all trades, master of none, but better still than a master of one."

A number of old phrases have been added to over time.

[–] dillekant@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 months ago

Was watching a YT video against this idea. Basically the occupancy is quite low per dollar, and generally there's not much expertise in building them. This means the city/state is tied to one company which can ream them price-wise. If you need the occupancy, get a train.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

The best one.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If the buses use electric traction and charge continuously whilst on the guideway, that could be a win, in allowing for smaller batteries and less downtime than a regular electric bus (especially if the unguided portion of the route is a “last mile”, comprising a relatively small proportion of the route). If they’re just regular diesel buses, it seems somewhat pointless.

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, but what's the advantage of it being guided? Instead it could have just be a private road that supports trolleybuses as well as emergency vehicles. Instead, it's a gadgetbaun.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If it is travelling on a precise guideway (more precisely aligned than a traffic lane), then it is possible to transfer electrical power to it safely, either by aligning a pantograph with an overhead catenary or by a system of conductive rails, Once you can do that, the vehicle’s weight drops (as it doesn’t need to carry as much fuel), increasing carrying capacity and/or reducing the frequency of required road maintenance, Additionally, as electrical power is fungible (and can be sourced from whatever generation method is most economical), running costs are decreased over combustible fuel (as long as you don’t need to store it in the vehicle).

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

None of those are advantages over a trolleybus.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 1 points 3 months ago

A trolleybus’s speed is limited by the need to maintain contact with the cable (or two cables, as the current needs an earth connection, which doesn’t help). A fixed guideway allows the vehicle to travel at higher speeds whilst retaining contact.

[–] 403@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 3 months ago

The obahn in Adelaide is elevated, near a river. Not often near other roads for emergency vehicles so would be of limited use for that. The bus has small horizontal wheels that keep it on the tracks, and allow it to go reasonably fast, about 80 km/hr between stops. Once it gets closer to the city, it does just use dedicated bus lanes, that emergency vehicles can also use. It's not perfect, but works pretty well and at morning rush hour I can catch a bus every minute or so from my stop. Most of the buses are pretty full, so that's a lot of cars off the road. Once the buses are full electric I think it will be even better and quieter.

[–] Zadhu@slrpnk.net 13 points 3 months ago

They drive on special tracks from the city out to the suburbs in a fraction of the time it takes to get there by car, then they just hop off the tracks and resume normal bus routes.

[–] flango@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 3 months ago

I just found this cool video explaining how it works, seems very simple.

video(YouTube)

But the comment section is terrible.