• Cryophilia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    basically exactly the same situation as we’re in now

    You think if we take away 50 years of burning fossil fuels we’d be in “the same situation as we’re in now”?? Wtf are you smoking?

    • bc93@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Do you really think that if the left was in favour of nuclear power it would replace 100% of fossil fuels with nuclear? As if it’s fucking green activists blocking nuclear and not the fossil fuel lobby. Whatever I’m smoking, it’s not as strong as what you have.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        As if it’s fucking green activists blocking nuclear and not the fossil fuel lobby

        It literally is, though I suspect the greens are the useful stooges of the fossil fuel propaganda.

        • bc93@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Lmao, sure buddy, the green activists who have been protesting and sabotaging fossil fuel infrastructure for decades are secretly doing so in support of it. That’s why we also support putting solar panels on every roof and massive deployment of wind turbines, because that’ll make money for fossil fuels somehow.

          What else? Wind turbines are also secretly 5G antennas that bill gates uses to control us?

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            So I quoted this sentence:

            As if it’s fucking green activists blocking nuclear and not the fossil fuel lobby

            And then you started talking a bunch of blah blah about renewables, which I will note is NOT in that sentence.

            And you did not mention nuclear, which I will note is the entire SUBJECT of that sentence.