• danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The iPhone was a novel concept as a whole. I think that’s undeniable. There was nothing like it at the time.

    edit: found the iPhone haters and their revisionist history. The iPhone changed everything. When it was announced, nothing like it existed. Before the iPhone, google was working on a blackberry clone, for instance.

      • phillaholic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why do you suppose both those companies fell off the face of the earth right after the iPhone came out? How many 12 year olds had them? The paradigm clearly shifted after the iPhone came out.

    • 520@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There were a bunch of products that had elements of the iPhone in them, but the iPhone was the first to bring a lot of them together into a technology that made the world shit it’s pants.

      The problem for Apple is, you cannot really patent nor copyright bringing together existing elements like that. Hence they had to rely on stupid sounding lawsuits on the tiniest things they actually had the patents for.

    • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Just as novel as the whole graphical desktop concept which they claim they’re the ones who invented it but always forget to state that Steve Jobs stole it from Xerox? By Steve’s words, everything Apple does today is a stolen product.