• Donkter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s kind of an outdated now too since it was a thought experiment and the monkeys were a stand-in for an abstract concept of a machine that creates an infinite amount of text. We have proof that even a finite number of randomly generated words will produce at least the first 1,312,000 characters of Shakespeare.

    https://libraryofbabel.info/

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Wrll that’s exactly what I mean: The monkeys themselves have zero consciousness in the allegory. The ENTIRE POINT is they do not understand what they’re writing. They are standing in for chaos, and Hamlet is standing in for any meaningful structure arising from chaos.

      To add desire and intention to the allegory is SPECIFICALLY choosing to miss the entire point that the monkeys DO NOT know what they write, and that’s critical to them being an agent of chaos.