Does anybody know how/whether this is going to affect hardware obsolescence?

  • GigglyBobble@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    That and the other good thing: no distro will make decisions that are even in the ballpark of insanity of those by big tech corps.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh, they do those all the time.

      And then either quietly backpedal once everybody complains or stick to it until everybody moves and they are dead.

    • Spiracle@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      no distro will make decisions that are even in the ballpark of insanity of those by big tech corps.

      Manjaro dev team enters the room.

        • Spiracle@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Someone made a website to compile them you might find, but here’s what I remember:

          • Putting the extraordinarily unstable test release of a package in their normal release. That package specifically included disclaimers that it was for testing only, not meant for any users, and it was very clearly not meant for general release to unsuspecting end-users.

          • Getting banned off the AUR (twice?) for DDOS-ing it due to their faulty code. As I recall, every machine queried the AUR for updates constantly, or something like that.

          • Breaking AUR dependencies because of holding back releases for a few weeks, which they regularly to improve safety. Basically, don’t use AUR on Manjaro.