Even if you have encrypted your traffic with a VPN (or the Tor Network), advanced traffic analysis is a growing threat against your privacy. Therefore, we now introduce DAITA.

Through constant packet sizes, random background traffic and data pattern distortion we are taking the first step in our battle against sophisticated traffic analysis.

  • impure9435@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    That’s one of the reasons why I love Mullvad, they actually care about their customers, not just about their bottom line

    • Dojan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      I wonder how much of a bottom line they actually have given how cheap their service is.

        • Dojan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Oh wow, I had no idea Nord could go that cheap. To me €5 a month felt really inexpensive.

          • jet@hackertalks.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            6 months ago

            I feel like every week someone on Lemmy says they would use mullvad except it’s too expensive. It’s refreshing to see somebody say oh yeah that’s fine.

            • sparkle@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              €5 a month for a VPN is expensive compared to others? I always saw Mullvad as one of the least expensive options other than like protonvpn and very few other open source ones. Most VPNs are hella expensive

              Personally I use Mullvad because it’s simple, very usable, open-source, and I can trust it the most (not to say some of the other open-source privacy-oriented options aren’t trustable). Ever since I got into programming, I’ve only ever used completely open-source options when I had the chance – if it’s not open source, I won’t use it. I make very few exceptions, like for games, because open source isn’t as successful there for the most part

            • Dojan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              I suppose it’s all a matter of perspective. When put next to a lot of other subscription services (like Netflix 😩) it’s pretty cheap. Compared to other VPNs maybe not so much? I’ve honestly never looked at a VPN-only service before, like Nord etc. as VPNs have never been something I’ve prioritised.

              Still, knowing what little I know about Mullvad, €5 a month for a VPN that prioritises privacy seems fair to me. Again, it’s less than any of the streaming services and if privacy is important then it seems a fair price to pay.

              • jet@hackertalks.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                I think with all things globally, we apply an intrinsic sliding scale. Down to how many hours of labor that represents for us. So if $5 is a few minutes of labor fine. But if it’s 5 hours of labor then people are less likely to jump on it.

                • Dojan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Oh yes, absolutely. I am privileged to be middle-class (which I can appreciate even more as I grew up a povvo bitch) in Sweden where €5 while not nothing (for me in my economic situation) is a reasonable expense for an interest. I could rent a film for that money, or take the bus to the nearby town. I also happen to know people for whom €5 is a significant sum of money, so like previously said it depends entirely on your perspective.

      • impure9435@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m pretty sure they are profitable, considering they were founded in March of 2009. You can’t really run a company without profits for 14 years, right? Just routing network traffic isn’t that expensive after all. They are the only ones being honest about it, other VPNs charge way more because they only want to extract money from their customers.

        • Dojan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          Cheers. Network related stuff isn’t my forte so I really have no idea about the costs. I just figured that the moment you start adding a decent amount of users the costs will go up, and €5 seems like a really fair price.

          • impure9435@kbin.run
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            6 months ago

            It’s actually the other way around, the more users you have the cheaper everything eventually becomes

              • impure9435@kbin.run
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                6 months ago

                Yes, there’s no reason this wouldn’t apply to a VPN provider. It’s also the reason NordVPN or Surfshark is so incredibly cheap.

                They have lots of users -> They can pay lots of money for advertising -> They get more users -> Everything becomes cheaper -> They can pay more for advertising

                You get the point