• Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s literally what it is but who would look to history when install they can rely on how they feel.

      There is no effective protest without violence and property destruction, I invite you to find a single historical example otherwise.

        • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Moderate, considerate and thought through opinions get massively down voted in this thread. Thinking problems through will always be a less popular than taking out the pitchforks and following the herd.

          I’m as disappointed in humans as you are, but I did find a few more bright spots in this thread :)

      • PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        That US soldier who self immolated a few weeks ago to protest the genocide in Gaza was pretty effective. Oh wait, no it’s still happening. And I guess self harm is still violence. Either way I agree with you.

        • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Bad example. There was tons of violence related to this boycott. There is always violence in a U.S. protest because conservatives insist upon it.

          From Wikipedia:

          King’s and Abernathy’s houses were firebombed, as were four black Baptist churches. Boycotters were often physically attacked.

          Two days after the inauguration of desegregated seating, someone fired a shotgun through the front door of Martin Luther King’s home. A day later, on Christmas Eve, white men attacked a black teenager as she exited a bus. Four days after that, two buses were fired upon by snipers. In one sniper incident, a pregnant woman was shot in both legs. On January 10, 1957, bombs destroyed five black churches and the home of Reverend Robert S. Graetz

        • BreakDecks@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          If you were around for the civil rights era, I know exactly what side of the sit-in movement you would be on.

        • DillyDaily@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          But what if your message is “can we all get along together please?” the other persons message is litteraly “you don’t deserve a vote, you don’t deserve equal rights, you don’t even deserve to drink the same water as me, you are not even legally a person, this is the law, get out of my face nigge* before the lynch mob arrives, because I won’t stop them”

          How are you supposed to remove yourself from that situation when that situation is brought onto you, and there’s no way to simply negotiate or compromise because the two “opinions” are diametrically opposed.

          If someone’s boot is on another person’s throat, I honestly don’t care if I sound like an asshole as I tell them to move their fucking boot. I’d rather be an asshole on the right side of history than a coward who was just following orders.