• rglullis@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    White noise it’s not copyrightable. So, anyone can make a copy, including Spotify themselves. They could “pirate” all the white noise podcasts and redirect them to something they own. Problem solved.

      • rglullis@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you are a Spotify exec, there is a problem.

        If you are an indie musician who sees your payout being reduced because Spotify says they need to pay white noise podcasts, there is a problem.

        If you believe that this is a zero-sum game and Spotify prints money like magic, there is no problem.

        • FringeTheory999@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          1 year ago

          No one should care about a spotify exec. This includes their parents and wife. Everyone who creates audio projects for spotify should be paid. This includes musicians and creators of ambient noise tracks. People like those tracks, they are popular, they should be paid. It’s not a difficult concept. Make a product. Distribute the product. Get paid for the product. You perception of the products relative value compared to other disimilar products in the same file format, is about the least relevant thing in the world. Even if you don’t think the product represents enough “effort” to be considered equal.

          All of this is crazy.

          • rglullis@communick.news
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I didn’t say anything about “value”, I said about copyright.

            If it is copyrightable, then the original creator of the concept should have rights, and the clones should be considered plagiarism.

            If it is not copyrightable, then it doesn’t matter who is the author, and Spotify can just do their own.

            All that, and we haven’t even mentioned that Spotify can just change the terms of service and get rid of the white noise podcasts. They are no obligated in anyway to keep a creator that is not worth the business.

        • Sentient Loom@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          All you’re saying is that different tracks/shows are competing for attention, and white noise is doing well in that competition. You could make the same argument about any genre.

          Country music is taking a portion of the income that white noise could get paid. Therefore remove all country music from sp0tify.

    • bomberesque1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well then, from a purely business pov, it seems that what spoitfy should do is wipe these white noise casts, post some of their own (possibly from a subsidiary) and watch that extra 38mill roll in

      • EssentialCoffee@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not podcasts, but Spotify does curate white noise playlists just like they do other music playlists.

        I listen to either Night Rain, Dreamy Vibes, or Floating Through Space some nights.

    • DarthBueller@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There have been claims inside youtube against white noise videos, so at least in their privately managed rights system, white noise is fair game for diverting $ from the poster of the content.