AccidentalLemming@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 year agodsfsdfdsfsdfasdwww.bloomberg.comexternal-linkmessage-square286fedilinkarrow-up1944arrow-down144cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
arrow-up1900arrow-down1external-linkdsfsdfdsfsdfasdwww.bloomberg.comAccidentalLemming@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 year agomessage-square286fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
minus-squareCabrio@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up34·1 year agoNot just that but due to the randomness of white noise data it can’t be compressed, so the bandwidth is much higher just because of that factor alone. Think 30mb for a white noise file the same length as a 3mb song.
minus-squareYourAverageKirbyFan@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 year agoThis is the real reason
minus-squaredb2@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down16·1 year agoI find this hard to believe. True white noise maybe, but it doesn’t need to be that for this use case.
minus-squareOpafi@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19arrow-down5·1 year ago I find this hard to believe Okay.
Not just that but due to the randomness of white noise data it can’t be compressed, so the bandwidth is much higher just because of that factor alone. Think 30mb for a white noise file the same length as a 3mb song.
This is the real reason
I find this hard to believe. True white noise maybe, but it doesn’t need to be that for this use case.
Okay.