• jkrtn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Does this make it possible to use the headset without ever having a Meta account? That’s the only way I’d be willing to interact with a Quest device.

        • gmtom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Bro the quest is only 5 years old. And stop excusing shitty practices just because they are the normal.

          • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Lol, the famously great reading comprehension of the Internet.

            1. I didn’t excuse shit

            2. 5 years of updates is a pretty normal timeline for mobile devices

              • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Pointing out that you’re whining about something thats irrelevant isn’t excsing shit, but reading comprehension is hard for you I guess.

                The initial point was that the dick move was blocking developers who wanted to and were able from sending content hosted on metas server to Quest 1 headsets. I responded with a sarcastic comment giving people a way to get around that dickheaded move by sideloading

                It is not related in any way to not giving security updates anymore. That’s normal EOL shit for devices and software. If you don’t like that or don’t like how long meta offered support that’s a you issue and I did not comment on it other than pointing out that 5 years is normal update life on devices like that after you already changed the subject

                • gmtom@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  something thats irrelevant

                  its perfectly relevant to the conversation.

                  Get out of this reddit mentality you have where every interaction you have with another person on the internet is an argument you’re trying to “win”.

  • hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m really hoping that Valve releases a new headset by the time my Quest inevitably becomes unusable.

    • DdCno1@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I would expect Valve’s next headset to be expensive, complex and requiring extensive configuration by the user, just like their previous efforts. Pretty much the polar opposite of the Quest.

    • ThunderingJerboa@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Are we going to ignore that VR adoption is basically held up by Oculus/facebook. I hate facebook and their support for their titles on the VR space are dreadful for instance it is unacceptable what they did with Echo Arena but you can literally look at the steam hardware survey and see that Oculus/facebook makeup nearly 70% (67.4% to be more accurate) of VR headsets in the market today for PCVR. Who the fuck is funding many VR game devs right now? I can tell you it ain’t many publishers and the biggest one right now is Facebook as much as I hate to say it. Facebook absolutely is a crutch VR needs to survive in this market but we gamers should make use of them for as long as possible then ditch them whenever its convenient for us.

      Hell the PSVR2 looking very juicy if that has great PCVR support and it doesn’t require any ps5 nonsense to work but PSVR2 is a perfect example of how VR is not in a great place and a big part of it is price related. Like VR nuts (like I) would gladly pay higher tier prices for a good headset but to some average joe, they see a headset that costs as much as a fucking console that only works with a limited number of games. Hell the thing can even make you sick trying to use it. Most people aren’t going to pay 1000+ dollars to try VR to see if they “like it”, hell they aren’t even paying $550.

      Again I’m not here to advocate for Facebook but I will sure as hell make use of their investments in VR because they are sort of throwing that money in a fire pit with how the market is. Facebook plans on trying to fill that fire pit with so much money it becomes a bridge that is profitable and it might be in the future but right now if you want someone to try VR, a oculus headset is probably the best bang for your buck headset especially if you buy it used since realistically most people are going to play with it for a month then be done with it and try to hock the thing.

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      The second I heard Facebook bought Oculus, I knew it’d be ewaste. Fuck zuck and any piece of shit greedy pig like him.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Not trying to negate what you said, but I honestly don’t remember people saying that. I remember people complaining about Oculus being bought.

  • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yeee anybody who bought these as an actual standalone headset is in for a rude awakening of how console gaming works and how app store monopolies and vertical integration are able to offer you prices that massively undercut the competition like this.

    As always - PC games are forever, piracy is forever. My quest 2 exists to have VD on it and nothing else, and when support is discontinued if the dev keeps updating it - I’ll sideload the .APKs myself.

  • Kir@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I hate this so much. Why should they be able to do this?

    One thing is stopping customer support and internal software/OS development. But why should they BLOCK compatibility for third party developers?

    • Gigasser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Better to have invested in a Valve Index I feel than get an Oculus. Might be more expensive, but I trust Valve to not completely fuck over their consumers.

      • ThunderingJerboa@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I mean not really. Again the index is a great headset but look at how long people actually use their headsets for. Is it better to throw your money into a pit that is $400 or $1000. VR is a weird since you either love it or hate it. Most people are going to hate it and many people aren’t really into the idea of reselling their stuff. This isn’t to say facebook good or some nonsense like that but from a prospective customer’s standpoint why spend so much money on something you might not even like. You don’t have to drill any holes in your walls to put up base stations while inside out tracking isn’t great it gets the job done and again its far more convenient. I like the option to have base stations but again realistically putting in so much work for something you might only spend a week or month on is not a great investment of your money or time. If you like VR, I would highly suggest getting a better headset than a quest or oculus headset but a newcomer I will 100% suggest a quest over anything else especially a used model to save them extra cash.

    • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Tech company, they love E-Waste. Your thing can still play fine? Fuck you, buy our new shit that have all those advanced privacy invasive tracker loaded into it, and let us snoop around so we can share your info with other tech company.

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I still can’t fathom people are somehow okay with buying a device that is, by design and function, festooned with cameras and microphones from goddamn Facebook and waving it around inside their homes. Like, what?

        • ThunderingJerboa@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Vr is very price prohibitive and Oculus/Facebook sell headsets at a loss to make their marketshare. Its not great but if you want to “try vr” especially something you hear will make you physically sick to use and you might not even like. Its just logical to spend the least amount of money on it for a “proper headset”. Like if you value your privacy that is fine and completely understandable but lets be honest here, most people don’t. Especially with the popularization of social media and smart phones like we can even apply the same logic with your argument with phones like why would you buy a device that has so many cameras and microphones and wave it around your home and toilet. Hell I think the phone is actually worse since most people bring them everywhere while a headset is a bit more constrained on where you can take it.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Not even planned obsolescence… It’s just “hey, you guys aren’t buying our slightly better new version. We were talking today about how to make a little bit more money, and we decided, hey, we don’t want to maintain this anymore. We also don’t want to unlock it and let someone else take over, and while we’re at it let’s just start shutting off features until you buy a new one. Because fuck you”

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m about to revive my CV1 as I reinstall my gaming rig in a couple months. I hope it won’t be bricked by those Facebook idiots.

    • antidote101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Yeah, via SideQuest (which is a sideloader program), and most game engine support quest development. However it wouldn’t surprise me if Meta were able to prevent that.

      They really are horrible to devs, they offer no real support, especially for Unreal devs, and their dev forums are practically dead because of this.

      They don’t understand how to encourage devs. I was thinking of getting a Meta Quest 3, but seeing this post has me reconsidering the idea.

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Device was released May 21, 2019. So about five years of use, assuming someone bought one on release day.

    Meh.

    • FlumPHP@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      And? Why take active steps to stop it from working instead of just stopping technical support? Oh yeah, to get more money.

        • FlumPHP@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Your entire comment reads as a refute of OPs criticism and an excuse for Meta’s actions. If you were agreeing with OPs criticism, you would typically use phrases like “only five years”.

          • intensely_human@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Or I would express that I’m on the fence between thinking the thing lasted long enough to be worth it, and thinking it wasn’t.