Well let’s see if it is worth it or if I go back to debian.

  • Johanno@feddit.deOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Gonna try that next. Probably. Nixos isn’t really working if I don’t know how to do stuff.

    For example I can’t change settings in vlc because it is read only.

    • Shareni@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s a whole different story when it’s just a package manager and not a distro. I made this comment to help people get started.

      I’d only use nixos if there was a specific reason. Otherwise it’s too much trouble for practically no benefits.

      • Johanno@feddit.deOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        The benefit would be: changing stuff doesn’t break it. And if it does you can easily roll back. Keeping the config file sets up a new installation like the old one without trouble. Somehow I don’t think you really need it if you aren’t distro hopping but I need it way too much.

        Currently the trade offs are too big I think. Programs don’t work because of the atomic behaviour.

        And the learning curve is steep even for Linux veterans.

        • Shareni@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          You don’t need nixos for that. The only thing you lose is rolling back system configuration, unless you use system-manager.

          Unless you’re doing scientific computing, or being a sysadmin for a company, you don’t actually need nixos. It’s at that scale that system reproducibility becomes important enough to offset the downsides. For everyone else, home-manager and a list of packages are more than enough.

          The learning curve is not that bad, it’s just that the resources are a pile of burning garbage.

          Also, idk what you’re doing with VLC, but ~/.config should still work AFAIK.