Well let’s see if it is worth it or if I go back to debian.

  • Shareni@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s a whole different story when it’s just a package manager and not a distro. I made this comment to help people get started.

    I’d only use nixos if there was a specific reason. Otherwise it’s too much trouble for practically no benefits.

    • Johanno@feddit.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      The benefit would be: changing stuff doesn’t break it. And if it does you can easily roll back. Keeping the config file sets up a new installation like the old one without trouble. Somehow I don’t think you really need it if you aren’t distro hopping but I need it way too much.

      Currently the trade offs are too big I think. Programs don’t work because of the atomic behaviour.

      And the learning curve is steep even for Linux veterans.

      • Shareni@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        You don’t need nixos for that. The only thing you lose is rolling back system configuration, unless you use system-manager.

        Unless you’re doing scientific computing, or being a sysadmin for a company, you don’t actually need nixos. It’s at that scale that system reproducibility becomes important enough to offset the downsides. For everyone else, home-manager and a list of packages are more than enough.

        The learning curve is not that bad, it’s just that the resources are a pile of burning garbage.

        Also, idk what you’re doing with VLC, but ~/.config should still work AFAIK.