The US Department of Justice and 16 state and district attorneys general accused Apple of operating an illegal monopoly in the smartphone market in a new antitrust lawsuit. The DOJ and states are accusing Apple of driving up prices for consumers and developers at the expense of making users more reliant on its iPhones.

  • Shouted@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Passing this would destroy Apple’s entire business, where they spend their effort and money deeply integrating their products to work together.

    Instead, they’ll have to spend their time and money creating an API to let random Joe make a watch for an ecosystem they did nothing to create, foster, or maintain.

      • Shouted@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        People don’t need to use an iPhone. A symptom of our declining society is expecting people or businesses to accommodate your personal interests instead of you making an adult decision.

        • gian @lemmy.grys.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          A symptom of our declining society is expecting people or businesses to accommodate your personal interests instead of you making an adult decision.

          A symptom of your declining society is expecting that the rules in place could be ignored.

          It is true, nobody is forced to buy an iPhone but this not means that Apple could play in the game with a different set of rules from everyone else.

          • Shouted@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            What existing rules? The rules designed for 19th/20th century oil companies that don’t apply to modern tech companies?

            New rules are being written.

            Apple could play in the game with a different set of rules

            They’re playing a different game because they’re the ones who built the ballpark they’re playing in. Don’t like the game? Don’t go to the ballpark.

            It’s so exhausting how you people simply can’t accept “don’t buy Apple” and leave it alone.

            • gian @lemmy.grys.it
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              What existing rules? The rules designed for 19th/20th century oil companies that don’t apply to modern tech companies?

              They can be old and technically it can be a stretch to apply them to a tech company, but they are still here.

              New rules are being written.

              That’s good

              Apple could play in the game with a different set of rules

              They’re playing a different game because they’re the ones who built the ballpark they’re playing in. Don’t like the game? Don’t go to the ballpark.

              As long as the ballpark is not a problem for other people, ok. But if the ballpark is a problem for the people playing…

              It’s so exhausting how you people simply can’t accept “don’t buy Apple” and leave it alone

              “Don’t buy Apple” is not a giustification for Apple to do something that is illegal, at least from the DOJ point of view.