Somewhereunknown7351@kbin.social to Fediverse@kbin.social · 9 months agoMeta just showed off Threads’ fediverse integration for the very first timewww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down10file-textcross-posted to: fediverse@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up16arrow-down1external-linkMeta just showed off Threads’ fediverse integration for the very first timewww.theverge.comSomewhereunknown7351@kbin.social to Fediverse@kbin.social · 9 months agomessage-square6fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: fediverse@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squareLibertyLizard@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-29 months agoSounds like federation is more theoretical than real at this point. I don’t see much point in one way federation. But does this mean that threads users could pop into this thread and comment?
minus-squareSomewhereunknown7351@kbin.socialOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-29 months agoNo, they can’t see our comments (and posts) but they can see likes
minus-squareLibertyLizard@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·9 months agoAh I guess I hadn’t thought it through fully. So this does almost nothing in the current implementation.
minus-squareSomewhereunknown7351@kbin.socialOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 months agoYes, this does almost nothing in the current implementation
Sounds like federation is more theoretical than real at this point. I don’t see much point in one way federation. But does this mean that threads users could pop into this thread and comment?
No, they can’t see our comments (and posts) but they can see likes
Ah I guess I hadn’t thought it through fully. So this does almost nothing in the current implementation.
Yes, this does almost nothing in the current implementation