this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2024
167 points (86.1% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35434 readers
580 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

EDIT: you guys have dug up some truly horrible pisstakes :D Thank you for those.

To the serious folk - relax a little. This is Mildly Infuriating, not I'm dying if this doesn't stop. As a non-native speaker I was taught a certain way to use the language. The rules were not written down by me, nor the teachers - it was done by the native folk. Peace!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cdf12345@lemm.ee 97 points 8 months ago (3 children)
[–] livus@kbin.social 50 points 8 months ago

@cdf12345 if you really want to infuriate people that should be "I could care fewer."

[–] ITypeWithMyDick@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Bastard stole my line

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Malix@sopuli.xyz 89 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (7 children)
[malix@derp ~]$ fewer .bashrc 
bash: fewer: command not found

:(

[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 16 points 8 months ago

$alias fewer = 'less'

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] redxef@feddit.de 29 points 8 months ago (1 children)
-bash: fewer: command not found
[–] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 22 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)
$ alias fewer=less
$ which fewer
fewer: aliased to less
[–] cloudless@feddit.uk 28 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Your post is fewer than 60 minutes old.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Arguably, that is correct: "minute" is a countable noun, so should take "fewer" as a modifier.

[–] cloudless@feddit.uk 7 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Yeah it is grammatically correct but most people would say "less than 5 minutes ago" or "less than 50 seconds", instead of using "fewer than".

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] viralJ@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I'm also a non-native speaker and I've also been taught to speak a certain way ("you and I are going" but "he saw you and me"; don't split infinitives; don't end sentences with prepositions, etc.), but then I read Steven Pinker's The Language Instinct and - even more relevant here - The Sense of Style. We've been taught to use language a certain way, but our teachers were following the prescriptivist school of thought. You say these rules were written by native folk, but it's often (if not usually) the native folk that say less when they "should" be saying fewer.

I know you said it's only mildly infuriating to you, but if proper use of language is something dear to your heart (as it is to mine) - I really recommend the above books as I think this is something not worth to get even mildly infuriated about. The border between less and fewer is fuzzier than you think and - in the words of Pinker - once you really master the distinction - that's one fewer thing for you to worry about.

Edit: typo

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Siethron@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago

I couldn't give fewer of a shit

[–] HatchetHaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

when people write should of instead of should have

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 20 points 8 months ago

I have used less several times when I should have used more...

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 16 points 8 months ago

Sorry, I'll do that fewer.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Bash says that the fewer command can't be found...

[–] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 6 points 8 months ago

less is more, though!

[–] random9@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I've corrected people a few times on this, but then I looked it up, and from what I understand, since language is defined by usage, saying "less" when technically it should be "fewer" is still generally correct. It still sounds alright to me, though oddly the reverse (using "fewer" when it should be "less") sounds fewer (aka less) correct to me.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago (9 children)

I’m a linguist and this is the answer. The correct usage is however people use it, not how a book editor, dictionary, or your third grade teacher think it should be used.

Example: “there’s” for both plural and singular rather than “there are” versus “there’s/there is”.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

People thinking the English language is static and has to follow rules.

This Is English, my friend. The top dog of non-proscriptive languages where meanings change over time and reflect current usage.

Want to force everyone to follow the rules?

Start speaking French.

[–] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It is also a tool to allow common understanding between a diverse group of people. I’m not saying that less/fewer is an important rule. However ‘anything goes’ is going to have an impact on people’s understanding of bothe you and your message

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

I'm not saying anything goes either but if people around you use less and fewer interchangeably, there is no communication breakdown at all.

Do you know the correct times to use practice vs practise?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GrievingWidow420@feddit.it 13 points 8 months ago (2 children)

bash: fewer: command not found

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Eyelessoozeguy@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

I've tried more instead of less, I will have to try fewer and see how it works, which repo is fewer on?

[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 12 points 8 months ago (2 children)

So what you're saying is we need to use 'less' fewer?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 10 points 8 months ago (8 children)

The thing I find interesting is how the mixing of less and fewer, is broadly accepted, whereas nobody tends to use ‘much’ and ‘many’ interchangeably.

I’m not quite sure why much/many is do conserved when fewer/less isn’t.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Hmmm - maybe I should be using "fewer" less times than I should be using "less" fewer times...

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

common usage is not the enemy

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Confusion is the enemy of communication. Clarity of language is critical to being understood. Correctly using "fewer" and "less" could theoretically provide context clues about what type of thing you're counting, but you will be understood irregardless of which word you choose to use.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Ok so, as a native English speaker, let me inform you, that whatever you think is a rule in English, isn't. It's a guideline. It's a hard language because we lack structure. The native teachers are teaching you the basic guidelines, not actual conversational English, which varies heavily on location, and social group.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

No link, no AUR and hard to google, thanks.

edit: the joke fell flat, because with how modern replacements often are named, fewer could easily have been a modern less.

[–] DirigibleProtein@aussie.zone 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Less people should be using “less” instead of “fewer”. 😜

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] elfin8er@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Well, you bastard. You're doing well!!!

load more comments (1 replies)

Same. It's like a tic, I'm compelled to mutter "fewer" in my mind, or else I can't keep paying attention

load more comments
view more: next ›