Nine states are teaming up to accelerate adoption of this climate-friendly device.

Death is coming for the old-school gas furnace—and its killer is the humble heat pump. They’re already outselling gas furnaces in the US, and now a coalition of states has signed an agreement to supercharge the gas-to-electric transition by making it as cheap and easy as possible for their residents to switch.

Nine states have signed a memorandum of understanding that says that heat pumps should make up at least 65 percent of residential heating, air conditioning, and water-heating shipments by 2030. (“Shipments” here means systems manufactured, a proxy for how many are actually sold.) By 2040, these states—California, Colorado, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, and Rhode Island—are aiming for 90 percent of those shipments to be heat pumps.

“It’s a really strong signal from states that they’re committed to accelerating this transition to zero-emissions residential buildings,” says Emily Levin, senior policy adviser at the Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management (NESCAUM), an association of air-quality agencies that facilitated the agreement. The states will collaborate, for instance, in pursuing federal funding, developing standards for the rollout of heat pumps, and laying out an overarching plan “with priority actions to support widespread electrification of residential buildings.”

  • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    do the math before you get one. In my area it’ll double or triple my electric bill due to the extremely high price of electricity. I would need to add a lot of insulation to my home to make it worth it. Also, installing solar would be a wiser first step. Of course, even then, with the installation costs, it will take 20-30 years to really see a savings.

    Edit: downvote all you want, it doesn’t change the math. I spent 6 months studying heat pumps for my situation, sorry it doesn’t live up to whatever eco-hype you’re huffing. The real issue is mismanaged utility companies with a legally protected monopoly. All I’m suggesting is you learn about your situation before you jump in blind, but apparently that is too offensive of a suggestion for the Lemmy hive mind. If you’re going to downvote, maybe give a counter argument, I’ll give you a math equation in response.

    • Null User Object@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      9 months ago

      If you need to add insulation to make switching to a different heat source worth it, then adding that insulation without switching will reduce your current utility bill. It’s not like the insulation (or lack ther of) cares how the heat was generated.

      • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        It depends on your climate zone… most people piling on the insulation bandwagon live in really cold climates. In more moderate climates, insulation makes your house is hot in the summer, which means you need to run the air conditioning. I don’t run air conditioning in the summer because our home is naturally cool. There are more summer months that winter months; so there are trade offs and reasons for different construction decisions.

        • Ross_audio@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Insulation doesn’t just keep heat in for the winter.

          It keeps heat out for the Summer.

          A lack of ventilation can cause buildings to overheat but anyone who seals up a building without adding a proper HVAC is a cowboy.

          You can add insulation without reducing ventilation. Do it.

    • Mr_Blott@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      I don’t get the “I’d need to add a lot of insulation” bit.

      So you’re heating your house just now with gas or something, and you’re basically just pissing it up a wall, and fuck the environment?

      • ratman150@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Some people don’t think that far ahead. One day their gas bill will be just as bad and they’ll still complain.

      • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Well, when the price of electricity is 3x the price of natural gas, it’s a different story. Also, low insulation in certain climate zones means you don’t actually need air conditioning in the summer time. Really depends on what your local climate is.

        • n2burns@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Our electricity is also about 3x the price of natural gas, and the math made sense for a heat pump over a gas furnace (Southwestern Ontario, Canada). We do have auxiliary natural gas and that is set to kick in at 20°F, but even then, the manufacturer’s chart says the heat pump’s COP > 2.0 (200% efficiency). If I remember correctly, it’s COP >3.0 by 30°F.

    • Brokkr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 months ago

      Installing better insulation is always the best first step, better than the climate control solution or solar. That’s why some of those states require insulation improvements before other rebates can be taken. Sometimes they also heavily subsidize the costs of improving the insulation.

      Once the structure is properly insulated, then the best option between heat pumps and solar depends on the cost of electricity, as you noted.

      • burrito@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        A while back I sealed and reinsulated my house and replaced all the duct work. It made a massive difference on my electric bill as my house’s HVAC system is a heat pump. I did all the work myself and got a rebate from the electric company and it ended up costing me about $1000 out of pocket. I did some calculations back then and my payback period was only a couple of years so it has been paying me back for quite a while now. It was one of the best things I have ever done.

        • assplode@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          We’re fortunate our utility (Puget Sound Energy) will give us rebates for DIY improvements as well.

          We installed a heat pump and got money back from the state and the feds.

        • Brokkr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          We hired a company to do our 2 story home. Half was a previous addition that didn’t need upgrades, but the other half got blown-in. Doors got new seals as well. Cost us less than 800 after the state rebates (which were all handled by the installation company). Also one of the best upgrades we’ve made.

    • assplode@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      It definitely makes sense to evaluate electricity costs. It’s unfortunately expensive to get a heat pump in some places.

      Where we live, the Seattle metro area, it was a huge cost savings to get our heat pump.

      Crunch the numbers and make sure it makes financial sense.

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      There might be federal or state programs that can help you with weatherization. I’d check into them because they’ll definitely save you money. Back when I was on oil it saved me about 10% on my heating bills, even in a drafty old farmhouse.

    • Contestant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      9 months ago

      “I don’t want to help at all unless I can see immediate personal financial benefits”

      That’s what you sound like

      • chilicheeselies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        That how life works. You dont know their situation. You dont know if they can afford in increase. Where i live i have heat pumps and it costs me $300 a month to heat a two bedroom apartment. And thats with keeping it at 68f. If the cost of the electricty is outrageous, what are people supposed to do?

        • Contestant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Sorry I thought everybody here understood personal sacrifices will need to be made in order to solve the climate change problem. Apparently not, we just like to blame corporations for selling us the things we demand (like gas heating)

          • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            There’s a very distinct difference between a personal sacrifice and literally impossible with their current finances. This is the most ignorant shit I’ve seen on this thread, and there’s been a lot.

            • Contestant@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              He doesn’t give the math of what he’s spending now vs with a heat pump, and he doesn’t say he CAN’T afford it, just that it will take too long for him to see the financial benefits. When others try to ask him about details, he doesn’t respond.

              The whole reason why we’re in this mess is the full cost of carbon is not paid by current consumers used to cheap energy. People need to accept that their western standard of living will be reduced to match the correct cost of these comforts without taking a sort of “carbon loan” for the future generations to pay.

              It’s a very hard pill to swallow, I understand.