In the spring of 2020, when President Donald J. Trump wrote messages on Twitter warning that increased reliance on mail-in ballots would lead to a “rigged election,” the platform ran a corrective, debunking his claims.

“Get the facts about mail-in voting,” a content label read. “Experts say mail-in ballots are very rarely linked to voter fraud,” the hyperlinked article declared.

This month, Elon Musk, who has since bought Twitter and rebranded it X, echoed several of Mr. Trump’s claims about the American voting system, putting forth distorted and false notions that American elections were wide open for fraud and illegal voting by noncitizens.

This time, there were no fact checks. And the X algorithm — under Mr. Musk’s direct control — helped the posts reach large audiences, in some cases drawing many millions of views.

Since taking control of the site, Mr. Musk has dismantled the platform’s system for flagging false election content, arguing it amounted to election interference.

Archive

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Democracy already lost to capitalism. Authoritarianism is the natural progression of allowing a minority to control most of humanity’s wealth/power/resources — a return to the mean that applied for 99% of recorded history.

          • Sodis@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            There is no full democracy, that can’t be attacked by fascists, if they get elected. There are enough examples for this in the world. Democracy needs the support of the citizens or it will not work. It is not a self-sufficient system.

              • psud@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                The word is spelt “sophisticated”

                And yes, a democracy with a sufficiently educated populous is immune to authoritarianism

                That’s probably why the American right attacks education

        • Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Isn’t authoritarianism the default type of government humans gravitate towards because there’s always some dumbass who wants to be king or emperor and they somehow pull it off?

          • ME5SENGER_24@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Because the rich promise to lift a specific subset of people out of the muck, in exchange for that specific subset allowing them to rule and to keep the rest of the population far from their golden thrones. Capitalism has always been the fault, greed has always been the motivating factor.

            People need to stop thinking that their life is any more important than their neighbor’s and start thinking that we’re all in it together and we should all enjoy the time we’ve got as best as we all possibly can. From king to peasant, from president to street rat we are all the same and should all be treated equally. How we can have billionaires and millionaires when someone will die homeless from hypothermia is beyond me. It’s not an individual responsibility either, that should be the goal of a good government; that all its citizens have in abundance and it should also be the goal of world leadership that nations work collectively to make sure that every citizen of every nation has in abundance.

            Instead we have dragons laying atop golden mountains

            • Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              I read a while ago that capitalism is cancer but industrialization isn’t. I think I see what you mean. Being driven by profit caused our well being to diminish to critical levels

    • Gamingdexter@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I am fairly sure Dump will win. I’m already prepping my brain for 4 years of idiots, scheming, sexism, racism, and all hail God. I’m sorry everyone, we have a lot of raging dumb idiots here

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        4 years of idiots, scheming, sexism, racism, and all hail God.

        If you think it will end after your years, you’re not prepping anywhere near hard enough.

          • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I bought a little bluewater sailboat about a year ago and went through most of my life savings getting it ready. Don’t get me wrong, my “life savings” was pretty paltry for 30+ years of employment, and it’s a really small boat. Next month I’ll be leaving the west coast and heading west.

            • BigWheelPowerBrakeSlider@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              That sounds amazing–and terrifying! You’re one of those real life “I bought a boat and just went people.” While I couldn’t do a boat open ocean, one day I hope to emulate you and do something like the Great Loop, and other adventures. Fair winds and following seas.

              • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Hey, thanks. Yeah, I sailed a lot as a kid, then just didn’t for several decades. It was always my dream to just go, but there was no way I could afford it. Then I found a pretty good deal, looked at my life and this country and just kind of said fuck it. It would be a blast to do the Great Loop! I hope you get to do it.

    • HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I was going to send my drone to Ukraine but I might need it here. Hilarious the maga folks think they’re the only ones with weapons

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    So cut his fucking security clearance already for fucks sake what the fuck even is this pussy shit.

    If drug use and election disinformation aren’t enough to kill his contracts, then the stupid fucking Democrats have no fucking balls.

    • Uranium3006@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      the stupid fucking Democrats have no fucking balls. it’s just true. they don’t have what it takes to stand up to fascism. we need to fight them ourselves

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        they don’t have what it takes to stand up to fascism.

        Man, what clued you in? For me it was it the bipartisan support for fascist leadership in Israel or because the Democrats keep going “well we have to make deals with fascists and limit your rights, because that’s democracy.” Cue the law they passed for their Republican buddies on a “deal” causing way more problems, never getting repealed, and then them acting like its a fucking win somehow.

      • Zorg@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        3rd party only works if it’s popular enough to replace one of the two ruling parties. FPTP does not allow for three large parties to coexist. There is no US 3rd party even remotely close to having a tiny chance at replacing anyone.

        • Zuberi 👀@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Bro if you haven’t looked at the unrest towards Biden on the left and the unrest towards Trump on the right, you aren’t paying attention.

          • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            There are similar things happening in Europe too. Because of the fascist parties rising, the “moderates” (corporatists) don’t have to do progressive politics. Because they know you basically have no choice but to vote for them. I believe this is part of the strategy of these donors, not for the fascists to win, but to undermine progressive politics or action on climate change.

      • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        What’s MIC? Does it stand for democracy in the US, which you are hoping to end by voting third party :D

  • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    “Oh, boo hoo,” Harmeet K. Dhillon, a lawyer whose firm represents Mr. Trump

    I mean, they are basically just good old fashioned trolls - sadists, sociopaths and narcissists and morons. And they are winning.

    We shouldn’t have been so mean to Elon. I blame reddit for this /s

  • some pirate@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Now that’s the real reason for dropping 44 billion on a zero profit only-costs platform. It already got Milei elected on Argentina, US and Mexico are next

    • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s an oldschool move: buy the biggest newspaper in town to crush opposing voices. And later: radio stations, TV stations, TV networks, and so on. Social media is just the latest iteration.

      Upshot is: If this is true, it’s kind of a big deal. It means that people banding together to share their opinions and taking jerks like this to task is worth billions to shut down. That’s how big a threat everyone is.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Right, 98% of it wasn’t anything about making money, improving the service, building something new, or allowing free speech.

      He just wanted to make sure Twitter said what he wanted it to.

      It’s been wildly successful on that front. Way way way more successful than, say, Truth Social.

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    It feels like why he wanted the site lol. The site is just a few steps above posting on truth social at this point.

  • garretble@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    When I become a billionaire I hope you guys don’t let me become just a trash human like basically every billionaire.

    • CatsGoMOW@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      You typically need to be a trash human being to begin with in order to become a billionaire.

        • Ooops@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Which means your upbringing and education is ripe with coditioning to become a trash human. So that’s just another chicken/egg problem.

  • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    There’s still the open version of fact checking: community notes

    What are the facts about this? That it doesn’t happen…that often?

    There’s no real time enforcement for it to mean anything. The votes are tallied in real time, and a winner is announced, then months to years later people (who are caught) are prosecuted?

    Can someone point out why mail in voting with no ID is a good thing? I’m genuinely curious

    • Nero@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Oh wow, your comment history is almost entirely defending Elon Musk. That must be exhausting.

    • oxjox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      If you’re still “genuinely curious” about the voter ID issue that has been discussed to death for nearly five years, please do yourself a favor and stay away from any political discussions.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Can someone point out why mail in voting with no ID is a good thing?

      1. You did not need an ID to vote for almost the entire history of the U.S. and no one had a problem with that.

      2. Oregon has been entirely vote by mail since 1998. A voter ID is not required. There have been no significant issues.

      So you point out why mail-in voting with no ID is a bad thing. Because it has been demonstrated to work without problems.

      • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Because we’ve all seen how fraudulent people can be right?

        This is minor, but take a video game for example - even with nothing to gain, lots of systems have to be put in place because people go out of their way to game the systems and cheat.

        Why would something with actual consequences be any different? Why wouldn’t you have even the simplest system in the way of that?

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Please present evidence of this fraud. You should be able to easily show it happening in Oregon. You have over 25 years’ worth of elections to find evidence for.

          • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I’m asking why you don’t want to protect your system and all you have to offer is “well it’s worked gud for 20+ years!”

            You sound like a conservative

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              “It’s worked without any problems for 25 years” is not good enough? Why? How many more years does it need to work without any fraud for you to accept that it is not an issue? 40 years? 80 years? 150 years?

                • CanadianCorhen@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  “here’s a road, there have been no accidents on it for 25 years. I’m saying, without proof, that its icy and we need to rip the road out. not to rebuild it, not fix it by spreading sand or salt, just tear it out.”

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  So there’s no evidence of fraud, there’s no indication of fraud, there’s no mechanism for fraud because of the way it is done, but you want it to be scrapped because maybe possibly fraud?

                  That makes absolutely no sense.

        • AnonTwo@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          The numbers are actually pretty small, and ironically the group claiming there are voting issues (republicans) are the ones primarily getting caught doing it.

          You’re arguing based on a scenario that has historically never happened on a level where it has had an effect on any election, past present or even recent.

          To be fair, I don’t think there’s harm in there being a voter ID, but there’s no evidence of there being an issue for it not being there either. The biggest issue would likely be it would take time, and the world has to keep moving.

  • vamp07@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    Everyone needs to take more responsibility for the nonsense they read instead of blaming it all on the platform or Elon.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Really? This is the same as “criminals should stop being criminals instead of having people complaining to the police that they don’t do their work”

  • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    the mods on Lemmy don’t care about election misinformation either. I have had a thousand people tell me that voting for cornel west counts as a vote for trump, and I have never seen it removed.

    hell, I was told this by a moderator for c/politics.

    • JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s not misinformation. That’s just unfortunate and an indictment of our current elections system.

      • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        it’s misinformation. votes for Cornel West only count for Cornel West. they do not count for Trump.

        • JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          That is technically true, but practically not so much. The way our elections are currently run, there are 2 candidates (again this is the practical truth not the technical truth). When turnout is high democrats win, and voting 3rd party for president is essentially the same as not voting at all. That’s what people mean, that unless it’s a vote for Biden, then it’s automatically a vote for Trump.

          To be clear, I don’t like this, it’s incredibly stupid and I want to be able to vote for actually good candidates. But that is not the current reality in the states. Vote 3rd party in your local elections and campaign for them too. That’s where it’s still possible to make that happen and lay the ground work for better choices in the future.

          • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            unless it’s a vote for Biden, then it’s automatically a vote for Trump.

            but that’s not true, in reality, at all.

            saying it or implying it is misinformation

            • JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Is that the only part you read? There was a bit of explanation before that conclusion. You’re going to have to address the substance of my argument if you’re going to make a real counter argument. The reply you just gave me is ‘nuh uh’

              • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                9 months ago

                I’m not making a counter argument: I’m pointing out your argument is not true. I don’t need an argument: you need to be truthful.

    • Kabloink@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      They weren’t wrong. There is a reason West is getting donations from conservatives like Harlan Crow that oppose his views.

                • PastyWaterSnake@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  How can you expect yourself to integrate well into any conversation when you’re fixated on “well technically…”

                  If 99% of people colloquially agree that A = B, then it doesn’t really matter if ‘A’ and ‘B’ are really the same thing if everybody knows what we’re talking about. It’s the most obnoxious shit when someone tries to argue in this way, and you’re not convincing anybody or adding anything meaningful to the discussion.

      • Bilb!@lem.monster
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        They are wrong. You can stamp your feet and insist otherwise because you’re scared of losing, but they’re wrong.

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      You being too dense to understand what they’re saying doesn’t make it misinformation.