• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    There needs to be regulations on the size of personal vehicles for a shit ton of reasons…

    But this one by itself should be enough.

    • SuiXi3D@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      There are… but there are loopholes. Which is why the vehicles get bigger every year. They’re all using loopholes to continue not bothering to meet the standards the regulations set forth.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Loopholes are always going to happen…

        But if you close them, then the problem is fixed.

        Currently we just ignore them, instead of passing regulations that close the loophole and clarify

        We could even go a step further and require plans to be approved by a regulatory agency before mass production can start.

        Boom, problem solved forever.

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Even better would be if the US switched from “letter of the law” to “spirit of the law” because as it stands, there’s a lot of lawmakers just throwing their hands in the air and saying “well they’re not breaking the letter of the law, so there’s nothing we can do” while completely ignoring that it’s clear that the person in question is breaking the spirit of the law when it was written.

          It allows for laws to be endlessly re-interpreted, and at this point even the Supreme Court has tossed out the idea of previous decisions actually mattering. They’ll just re-interpret every law to be beneficial to their purposes every time they need to re-interpret it.

          At a certain point you have to stop and admit the loopholes are being left open on purpose.

  • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Road taxes should increase after certain dimensions and weights. Bonnet/hood height should be one.

    Also, safety ratings should give equal weighting to the a vehicle’s impact absorbtion and impact contribution. It’s insane that something is considered safe solely because the occupant is protected.

  • SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    No shit? I forget where I saw the comparison but the length of the view that is blocked when being in a big ass truck is absolutely insane. There could be a gaggle of kids in front of you and you would never know until you hit them.

      • n2burns@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I mentioned this is another comment, but the crazy thing is that’s the driver’s view from M1 Abrams. Typically, in hatches open operation you’d either have a Crew Commander (and/or gunner) standing with their torso out of the turret for better visibility (and a second set of eyes), or a ground guide watching where you go.

        • farcaster@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Perhaps we should introduce a commander’s hatch to help large pickup trucks safely navigate around neighborhoods.

  • MiDaBa@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    A truck has to have a nose that looks like a big slab of concrete to oncoming traffic. If it doesn’t men will be forced to wear dresses, sing show tunes while sitting to pee. Thems the rules.

  • doublejay1999@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    , I felt physically threatened just standing next to some of the products

    Yes, that’s why they make them like that.

  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    It is honestly a major failure of US society (comedians I am looking at you) that people aren’t made fun of for driving these trucks so mercilessly that most people feel too ashamed to drive them.

    I mean lots of other failures too, it shouldn’t be legal especially because there is zero reason for the high hood height from a vehicle function perspective. Unless of course you consider your vehicle being more efficient at killing pedestrians a reason to have them that way. I suppose we have entered that stage of things here in the US haven’t we.

    • Mr_Blott@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Definitely. Builders and contractors in Europe drive vans; same as everyone else on the planet except the insecure yanks. If you pulled up to a site in one of these in any other country, I fuckin guarantee remarks will be made about your penis size and your penchant for the cock

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s ok though, in about 30 years after 2 million children are dead, we’ll make a law that limits the height of hoods, effective 5 years from then.