The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists will remind healthcare workers of their duty to maintain patient confidentiality in new guidance, which is yet to be published.

Medics should not report suspected cases of illegal abortion to the police, leading women’s doctors are set to say.

The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) is expected to publish new guidance that it is “never” in the public interest to share information about suspected illegal abortions.

It comes after high-profile prosecutions, including that of Bethany Cox, who was accused of using poison for an at-home abortion in 2020.

  • 😈MedicPig🐷BabySaver😈@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Ahhh, we are in crazy times around the globe. Medics shouldn’t say a goddamn thing to cops. Provide proper patient care. It should never be medical staff opinion on what’s legal or not.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) is expected to publish new guidance that it is “never” in the public interest to share information about suspected illegal abortions.

    Meanwhile, Carla Foster was jailed last year for illegally obtaining abortion tablets to end her pregnancy - but her sentence was reduced on appeal.

    “We firmly believe it is never in the public interest to investigate and prosecute women who have sought to end their own pregnancy,” RCOG president Dr Ranee Thakar said.

    “Outdated, antiquated abortion laws mean women who have experienced unexplained pregnancy loss are also vulnerable to criminal investigation, and health professionals are placed under unacceptable and unwarranted scrutiny.”

    Healthcare workers must also abide by their “professional responsibility to justify any disclosure of confidential patient information or face potential fitness to practise proceedings”, the college added.

    A Crown Prosecution Service spokesman said they “carefully consider” personal circumstances of those who end their pregnancy outside the legal parameters and “address these as sensitively as possible”.


    The original article contains 503 words, the summary contains 165 words. Saved 67%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    For me it should be treated the same way if someone showed up clearly after drunk driving and had an accident. The same way if a doctor suspected of anything illegal in his patients. Idk how it’s handled legally, but it should be consistent

    • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      that varies across the countries. where I live, a doctor must not reveal anything the patient has told them during a visit/medical procedure/etc., with the only exception being when there’s a risk of a future harm. so a doctor can’t report the patient has admitted to having murdered someone, but should report if they say they’re about to.

      • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        For the United States, it’s not even just some risk of future harm. The standard is much stricter, it’s if “a provider determines that there is a serious and imminent threat of a patient physically harming self or others.” Has to be something very specific and imminent for confidentiality to be breached.

        There are a few more edge cases though, for instance doctors and other healthcare workers are usually mandatory reporters by law, so if they suspect child abuse they are legally obligated to report it. Another one is for infectious disease tracking and reporting, there may also be confidentiality exceptions.

        • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          if “a provider determines that there is a serious and imminent threat of a patient physically harming self or others”

          yeah, pretty much the same, I’m just not that eloquent in English :P

          there’s a similar clause with some infectious diseases if I remember correctly, and I’m honestly not sure how’s the suspected child abuse handled, but probably the same.