Bill Gates-backed nuclear contender Terra Power aims to build dozens of UK reactors - CityAM
www.cityam.com
A Bill Gates-backed clean energy player is hoping to build dozens of nuclear reactors in the UK and will compete with global rivals.

Bill Gates-backed nuclear contender Terra Power aims to build dozens of UK reactors::A Bill Gates-backed clean energy player is hoping to build dozens of nuclear reactors in the UK and will compete with global rivals.

  • DerGottesknecht@feddit.deEnglish
    1·
    1 year ago

    once you have reactor designs up and running, building a lot of capacity both cheaper and quicker.

    But its the same with renewables and storage, they will improve as well and most likely keep their cost advantage.

    And you seem to ignore Opportunity costs again. If we build to much nuclear plants and don’t need the energy later we could have invested the money better in other areas, like education. Again, money is a finite resource.

    And another reason why I prefer renewables to nuclear is decentralisation. With renewables everyone can partake in energy generation, while nuclear is only for big corporations or governments. I’d rather have a robust decentralised grid where almost everyone is consuming and producing local most of the time than a grid relying on a few huge producers, which are a huge target for sabotage or vulnerable to natural catastrophes.

    • CapeWearingAeroplane@sopuli.xyzEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      I see your points, and largely agree with them. I don’t think we’re going to convince each other here, and thats because we put very different weight on the question

      “What if we end up needing it, but haven’t built it?”

      To me, that is the deciding question, which makes me argue that we should invest in it, while for you it seems the answer is that we should invest in such a way that we minimise the probability of needing it in the first place, which I think is a fair answer.

      • DerGottesknecht@feddit.deEnglish
        1·
        1 year ago

        Thats very aptly put. I would also like to not only work the supply side and make demand more flexible to better work with renewables. And maybe get rid of personal cars and get people to ride more bikes and so on… And if we manage to stall/reverse global warming in the next 20 years we hopefully have fusion for all of the really big energy needs.

        But most importantly, we need to do everything to get rid of fossil fuels as fast as possible. And that’s where I think we agree completely.

        • CapeWearingAeroplane@sopuli.xyzEnglish
          1·
          1 year ago

          Definitely! We have to do pretty much everything we can to prevent the world from burning and drowning simultaneously.

          On that note - I should probably get back to work ;)