• net00@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I dusted off an old laptop, put debian on it, put an SSD and now I have my own invidious instance, among other services…

    No ads, no throttling, no bullshit. Google is very welcome to suck it. I’d gladly stop using youtube, but there’s no competition.

    • Amir @lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      The no competition in the market, is the issue. Hope the situation improves in near future. With it innovations will gradually increase & the demand within the markets will point the directions.

      • 0xD@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If everyone keeps expecting everything for free there will never be competition :)

        • eskimofry@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Let me convince you otherwise:

          1. Who set that expectation in the first place? Don’t all cut-throat corps undercut the previous established companies and gained a lot of market share by being “loss leaders”?
          2. Do you think YouTube would dare to go completely Pay only?
          3. Lack of competition is not an excuse to double dip on both customer data and advertisements.
          4. People who say that we need to pay for server costs should consider that streaming services are now asking for money but also introducing adverts. The money is too lucrative for them to leave on the table.
          5. Everybody is happy to pay when there’s 1 service or 2 services that give them everything for a nominal fee. Cases in point: Netflix, Steam.
          6. A lot of people pay for twitch because it’s the only platform they care about. Paying for A platform doesn’t mean we will pay for ALL platforms.
        • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Or, there is plenty of competition even now, but since users are the product, not the customer, the competition isn’t what people think it is or should be.

    • sfgifz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Next step is guaranteed to be limiting the number of views without being logged in.

      • net00@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The more stuff they do to shoot themselves in the foot, the sooner something else comes in to replace youtube

    • soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is competition when it comes to technology stack. People just don’t want to use alternatives because the amount of content/users is less on others.

      Be the pioneer and help others move across.

      • keyez@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Care to share any of the recommendations? I don’t use YouTube often but would be happy to visit and use an alternative

    • 5redie8@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thank you for reminding me to get myself an invidious instance set up. It isn’t a huge pain or anything, right?

      • net00@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not really, they have a docker compose file ready to go, and it works without issue.