A federal judge in Florida ruled a U.S. law that prohibits people from having firearms in post offices to be unconstitutional, the latest court decision declaring gun restrictions violate the Constitution.

U.S. District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, a Trump appointee, cited the 2022 Supreme Court ruling “New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen” that expanded gun rights. The 2022 ruling recognized the individual’s right to bear a handgun in public for self-defense.

The judge shared her decision in the indictment that charged Emmanuel Ayala, U.S. Postal Service truck driver, with illegal possession of a firearm in a federal building.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      10 months ago

      Some people are required to carry firearms. If your job is armed security, you shouldn’t have a potential felony charge for going to the post office after work and dropping a letter in the night drop with your gun locked in the car.

      Just have federal buildings follow the laws of the states they’re in regarding the definition of premises for firearms. That is - apply it to the buildings, but not to the cars in the parking lot.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          10 months ago

          What’s a more secure place for a firearm? Unattended in a locker or actively in the possession of the person licensed to have it?

            • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              15
              ·
              10 months ago

              How so? Where do you keep your wallet? How about your keys?

              The most secure place to store something isn’t to leave it unattended. It’s to actively have it on your person.

              • otp@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                17
                ·
                10 months ago

                Do you take everything valuable from your house and your car with you from wherever you go? Or do you just lock them up and leave them unattended? Lol

                The most secure place to keep something is to leave it locked up in a safe place. A person can get robbed…even if they have a gun, lol

                • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  I obviously can’t be in physical control of everything I own, but extra precautions have to be taken with handguns. If someone steals my Xbox or camera gear, it sucks. If someone steals my gun it’s way more serious.

                  For my pistol I take extra precautions beyond keeping them in a box at the office that I don’t control. I have a hidden safe in the floor of my car bolted down such that removing it would first require the removal of the gas tank. I also have a safe at the house for my long guns that’s both hidden and concreted in so that a jackhammer would be required to remove it.

                  The combination to the safes are in my head and written in a sealed envelope in a safety deposit box in case I die.

                  Whether it’s hidden in a holster, in my car, or at my house my firearms are more secure than keeping them at an office where I have no control over who has access to them.

                  • meliaesc@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    9
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    It’s interesting that your only concern is a bad guy taking your gun. Whereas, from our perspective, you are the one who could crack at any time and go on a rampage. If you have a gun for work, you should not have that gun outside of work. You are not responsible for stolen property or damage at work outside of your work hours, unless you willfully leave a weapon unlocked.

              • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                17
                ·
                10 months ago

                I don’t take my wallet and keys with me to secure them. I take them with me because there is a good chance I’ll want to use them.

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                10 months ago

                See you think that. But I don’t think you know the people I know. Even the military locks up guns when they aren’t in use.

                • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  On a fucking military base. That’s slightly more secure than the standard office locker.

                  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Hahaha. Yeah, totally always on base. Never in a random downtown building… They would never ever do that.

      • ettyblatant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        FWIW, the amount of security guardsin Florida is pretty small at 0.4032%. I don’t know the percent of those who carry for work, but the number of cops that carried (all data 20/21/22) was also small at 0.246%. Combined, that gets us to the measurable number of Job Guns at .649% of the population in 21/22.

        The idea that these people’s hindrances should even be acknowledged, let alone come into consideration when making or tossing out laws, is fucking absurd.