this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
1406 points (97.6% liked)

People Twitter

5182 readers
1565 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Norgur@kbin.social 286 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Walked right into this one, didn't he?

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 143 points 10 months ago (1 children)

In fairness the setup was absolutely beautiful. She's some woman for the zingers.

[–] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 134 points 10 months ago

Well, the setup worked for whichever side chimed in. Elon never stood a chance. The fact that she was describing multiple people is truely terrifying. But I guess that's her point.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 186 points 10 months ago (17 children)
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 75 points 10 months ago (3 children)

She was definitely talking about Elongated, but probably had that comeback planned ahead of time.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 42 points 10 months ago

It's everyone's dream come true - when the comebacks you think up in the shower or before going to bed actually get to be used

[–] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Hasn't AOC been involved in institutional debates about Meta for a long while now?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Maddie@sh.itjust.works 174 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Fucking savage, I love AOC!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Sharpiemarker@startrek.website 140 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (7 children)

I bet that toasted his buns. His ego is at critical mass.

[–] Rubisco@slrpnk.net 41 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Once someone explained it to him.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 115 points 10 months ago (9 children)

So vain he probably thinnks this xeet is about him.

I assume xeet is the new word for tweet.

[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 41 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world 38 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I like xit too though. It just works better. Xitter, folks all xitting. If it’s a good xit they can say it’s popping.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 25 points 10 months ago (1 children)

"it's an x! You send X's on X!"

-Elon, probably.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago (4 children)

In a recent interview this came up, and the best word be said he could come up with was post, but he was hoping for something better.

I don't think they'll ever get something good like tweeting on twitter. X is terrible for that.

[–] Lightor@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago (1 children)

By every metric it's horrible. Searching for the term, using it as a verb and noun, ease of saying it in a sentence, recognition, as a logo, color scheme, the fact that X sounds a lot like ex as in something I previously engaged in but no longer do (irony) . I mean I could go on and on.

I refuse to believe no one told him how poor of an idea it is, I think he just has too much money to be able to listen to others.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I bet you think this xeet is about you

Don't you

Don't you

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] jtk@lemmy.sdf.org 72 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Is there a place to verify these posts are real without actually touching Twitter (currently known as Elon Musk's X)? I see there's blue checkmarks on them but I have a feeling a really cleaver hacker could fake those in an image.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 71 points 10 months ago

Here’s my Nitter search with some filters:

The iPhone let me copy that text out of the image (fastest way was to screenshot and then hold my finger on the text in the screenshot preview). I then tapped “look up” and DuckDuckGo found articles about the exchange. But for less popular Tweets, Nitter should work.

Link

[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 48 points 10 months ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 23 points 10 months ago (4 children)

You don't need to be a hacker to edit an image...

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 72 points 10 months ago (11 children)

It's honestly really gross that he immediately jumps to thinking she's hitting on him. Like, him freaking out and going into a fit of rage might have been a less terrible response.

[–] BillyTheSkidMark@lemm.ee 127 points 10 months ago (6 children)

I assume he doesn't really think that, but thinks he's being a cute troll. Like picking 420.69 for everything.

Trying to deflect assumed criticism about him by being "funny".

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 41 points 10 months ago

Musk sent the funniest response he could possibly think of.

Remember middle school?

NO I WON’T MAKE OUT WITH YOU!

Or was that elementary?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] tygerprints@kbin.social 62 points 10 months ago

Hooray for AOC telling it like it is, and getting under Elon Musks' pimply oily hide. She knows exactly what she's doing.

[–] Talaraine@kbin.social 40 points 10 months ago

Man I really needed that laugh this morning lol

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 36 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Does Zuck hang out with Tucker & Thiel also? It wouldn’t surprise me, but I hadn’t heard about it…not to the extent that Elon does, anyway.

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 27 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I assume anyone in silicon valley with two commas has hung out with Thiel at some point. He was one of the earliest investors in FB

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 34 points 10 months ago (26 children)

Any armchair psychologists care to weigh in on Elmo?

[–] Restaldt@lemmy.world 45 points 10 months ago (4 children)
[–] Fedop@slrpnk.net 19 points 10 months ago

Honestly, I think it's that simple.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
[–] Dehydrated@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago

Wait is this real?

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 20 points 10 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›