Well sorry man, you just seem to be getting bothered. I wanted some discussion since porn is kind of a problem for young kids these days. I don’t think confiscating things is logical, I just think there should be stronger controls online, maybe closer to Japan. they make you login to your Google account to verify your age before showing search results with any porn. What they don’t do is connect information on everyone entering every site… Obviously this isn’t what North Carolina is doing, but I figured this was a forum where discussion was allowed. But i guess in the US you’re either a hard-line liberal or hard-line conservative. Where my hard-line moderates at?
Well sorry man, you just seem to be getting bothered. I wanted some discussion since porn is kind of a problem for young kids these days. I don’t think confiscating things is logical, I just think there should be stronger controls online, maybe closer to Japan. they make you login to your Google account to verify your age before showing search results with any porn. What they don’t do is connect information on everyone entering every site… Obviously this isn’t what North Carolina is doing, but I figured this was a forum where discussion was allowed. But i guess in the US you’re either a hard-line liberal or hard-line conservative. Where my hard-line moderates at?
You willfully associate yourself with an extremist in public, and I’m in the wrong for assuming you’re also an extremist? Lol. Lmao even.
Hmmm… I still agree with their original comment “it’s not fascist to try and stop kids from accessing porn”.
I see that as pretty broad, and not necessarily indicating they want to collect information on people.
Wanting to stop kids from accessing porn? Not fascist.
Wanting to do it using force and/or violence? Fascist.
Wilfully ignoring the context because it doesn’t suit your argument right now? Scummy.