this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2023
259 points (94.8% liked)

News

23259 readers
3379 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

After a voter said he found it “astonishing” that Haley hadn’t used the word “slavery” at any point in her answer, she asked, “What do you want me to say about slavery?”

all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SpacePirate@lemmy.ml 106 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (7 children)

We need to have capitalism. We need to have economic freedom.

Freedom to do what, Nikki?

freedom to do or be anything they want to be without government getting in the way.”

Freedom to exploit anything for profit, got it.

So if it’s not illegal, it’s fair game. And guess what wasn’t illegal until the Thirteenth Amendment? And guess what we had to do in order to pass that amendment?

Fight a civil war, right.

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 42 points 10 months ago

We need the freedom to take away all the freedom that you have that we don't like!

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago

Guess what’s still legal as long as you got convicted of a crime and get a prison sentence?

[–] Fridgeratr@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Free to be anything unless that means LGBT or black or not Christian

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

Freedom to be trans? Oh ohhhh #checkmate

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

We need to have capitalism.

This need to have capitalism by both of our ruling parties is why the American Dream no longer exists.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

Guess what is not illegal even with the 13th Amendment? Slavery is a legal form of punishments.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 66 points 10 months ago (2 children)

LMAO

The exchange drew a swift response from Democratic National Committee Chair Jaime Harrison. “This isn’t hard: condemning slavery is the baseline for anyone who wants to be president of the United States,” he said in a statement.

President Joe Biden also responded with a post on X, saying, "It was about slavery."

I used to believe so many things.

And Trump really showed us that all those things we thought a president should be was optional.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

Back in the day, Ronald Reagan figured out that of X% of the population was African American and X+1% of the population was racist using anti-Black dog whistles was the way to go. The problem was that the racists got tired of the dog whistles and demanded politicians who said exactly what they wanted to hear.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 58 points 10 months ago (5 children)

“I think the cause of the Civil War was basically how government was going to run — the freedoms and what people could and couldn’t do,” Haley said at the beginning of her response.

She went on to say: “I think it always comes down to the role of government and what the rights of the people are. And I will always stand by the fact that I think government was intended to secure the rights and freedoms of the people. It was never meant to be all things to all people.

Darned guv'ment trampling the rights of slaveholders.

[–] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 41 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I always love the, "it was about state's rights," people.

Yes, you're absolutely correct. It was about the state's right to let rich white men own black people.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

technically I believe the south was more so mad that the northern states passed laws that allowed slaves to become free people once they escaped north. Then, the south couldn’t reclaim their slaves and they got mad and threatened a war. So it was actually the northern states’ rights that started a lot of the feuding.

[–] Papergeist@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The fugitive slave law was in effect at the outbteak of the civil war and wasn't repealed until 1864.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

It wasn’t though. My state (Ohio) was stopped from freeing all people who cross our borders. We were stopped from refusing to reenslave and return people who escaped to our state. We wanted to do these things and the states that seceded blocked us from doing them. Then when they seceded they openly banned abolition of slavery in their constitution. Meanwhile 4 union states were permitted to allow slavery to continue until after the war. Those 4 states were the last states to see abolition.

From the confederate perspective the civil war was about the right of white people to own black people no matter what.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

They actually had the state right to let rich white men own black people before they separated. States choosing to ban slavery scared the rich southern slave owners.

The Confederacy made it a federal right. The poor southerners were literally convinced to fight and die to not be allowed to make their own state laws on the matter.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

And I will always stand by the fact that I think government was intended to secure the rights and freedoms of the people.

So people in slavery weren't "people", Haley?

[–] mean_bean279@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Her answer reminds me of that old Miss America 1/5 of Americans can’t identify America on a map question.

Link

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

She's certainly speaking to her audience, absolute morons.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

They actually think the South was the side fighting for freedom, and the good guys lost. These psychos are trying to be the only ones in charge of everything.

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't find it astonishing. Let's stop pretending like the GOP isn't a group of racist, fascist assholes.

There's nothing to wonder about here. Nikki Haley is, like the rest of the GOP, perfectly fine with white supremacy and everything that comes of it up to and including slavery.

[–] rosymind@leminal.space 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I'm not sure that it's true that she is "fine with white supremacy" but you're right that she is likely trying to appeal to those that are.

Based on what little I know about her, (like most politicians) she wants to win, and will say whatever the "correct" words are to get the most pepple vote for her. She's also trying to win over trumpers, and she knows to dance around certain topics to do that. Problem for her is she is starting to come across as spineless in the media, which is the opposite of how (I think) trumpers see their Orange-Supreme-Leader

But yeah, she also gives off a vibe of being more rational and moderate which is what makes her a credible threat to Biden. (So I'm glad that she's fucking things up for herself, and if she can continue to put her foot in her mouth that's a plus)

[–] CurbsTickle@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

She hides her background (Indian), changed her name, changed her religion to Christianity, said she was proud of the Trump administration (after Jan 6th), has stated that all Republicans need to rally around Trump, claims there is no racism in America (despite the incredibly racist remarks used against her only 15 years ago).

She pandered to the racists with regards to the confederate flag, saying “Those South Carolinians view the flag as a symbol of respect, integrity, and duty. They also see it as a memorial, a way to honor ancestors who came to the service of their state during time of conflict. That is not hate, nor is it racism".

She has defended the secession that brought about civil war.

I'd say she's pretty ok with white supremacy.

[–] rosymind@leminal.space 1 points 10 months ago

Fair point (s)

[–] Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

She’s pulling a Ron Desantis. We had actual Nazi’s in full bullshit in Florida holding his signs and promoting him as governor and he wouldn’t disavow them. She is cut from the same cloth, she wants their support.

[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

State Right to enslave people. That is the primary cause and what it was being fought over.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

You are right technically that they fought over that. But they fought to get rid of that state right, which they already had. The Confederacy made it a constitutional, federal right.

The south fought and died to get rid of their own rights for the benefit of the rich.

[–] just_change_it@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's about tradition!

Traditionally many, many children died at childbirth or soon after due to the lack of medical care and vaccines.

Traditionally the rich, wealthy and powerful have held almost all the cards of power, keeping most to themselves while denying the elevation of new generations - "new money" vs "old money" is a great example of how they try to minimize meritocracy.

Traditionally snake oil salesmen were everywhere and misleading claims were status quo. This is where we are today with politics, maybe it's always been this way too. Gotta love those weasel words!

Traditionally though... women couldn't run for office, vote, or have any real kind of say. Not really sure how you can run on a tradition platform and just gloss over that.

Oh, and traditionally in terms of human society the rich and wealthy have always owned slaves, serfs and other humans because their families had amassed wealth and land first. We're returning to this with landlordship in the USA.

Ah well, fighting over scraps until humans go extinct in the next couple of generations. No helping it imo.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Traditionally though… women couldn’t run for office, vote, or have any real kind of say.

More to the point, Nikki Haley couldn't do those things. She wouldn't have a campaign.

[–] BenLeMan@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You know you're living in the craziest timeline when the party of Lincoln is more evil than the actual Church of Satan.

[–] expr@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago

Hasn't been the party of Lincoln ever since the parties switched due to the southern strategy.

[–] crsu@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

She can go lower, she'll do anything for power

[–] penquin@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

This woman will end Union (or at least tries her hardest) as we know it. She's the biggest union buster and she's proud of it. Corporation love her so much

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't believe that Nimarata thinks about black people enough for slavery to have even registered in her consciousness.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 1 points 10 months ago

It's just how you have to frame it if you're a Republican in the south. She knows what it was about, but didn't want to say the words because it would upset a good chunk of her electorate.