• BlueÆther@no.lastname.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      it’s worse than that, the article talks about img2img using AI. so these click farms are ripping real images and using that as the img2img prompt

    • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      AI trained on plagiarized art created by real humans who were not compensated for work that AI companies are now making money on.

      Aka stealing

      • BlueÆther@no.lastname.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        it’s worse than that, the article talks about img2img using AI. so these click farms are ripping real images and using that as the img2img prompt

      • Sorgan71@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        40
        ·
        1 year ago

        Its not plagarism. Its not stealing either. Its training. The only artists who complain about this dont care about making art and are only concerned about making money.

        • PLAVAT🧿S@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          When a robot replaces your job (or perhaps your friends or family) and you/they lose their way of earning money will your argument remain the same?

          If AI/robots could give us the utopia from sci-fi books it’d be grand and I’d be inclined to agree with you. But they aren’t, no one is getting early retirement because a robot replaced them in a factory and artists aren’t getting residuals from the derivatives these “trainings” are creating. It’s theft, outright, and the thieves are trying to make money off these originals.