Well, I’ll be damned. They finally won one it sounds like.

    • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      80
      ·
      11 months ago

      I believe that Google wanted in-app purchases in Fortnite to go through Play Store so that Google would get 30%. And Epic wanted to setup their own in-app billing and keep it all.

        • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          48
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          A lot of this case hinged on the fact that Google wasn’t treating everyone the same. They had a lot of private details for big companies.

          Unless Apple also has secret deals, then this isn’t going to impact them.

          • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Apple wouldn’t need to have secret deals. They’re running a walled garden over there. You can’t side load, and you can’t run payments through the app without Apple’s approval. That case was about Apple forcing developers not to even talk in the app about the possibility of making a purchase elsewhere, like through their websites. It wasn’t a deal, it was Apple strong-arming a developer because they could.

            The problem is Google wanted to have what Apple has: a closed ecosystem they can exploit. But they don’t have that, at least not to the same degree. Android is not “theirs”, even if they’ve increasingly managed to make the Play Store more inseparable as time has gone by.

            The most they can do is scare people away from using third party app stores or doing anything with Android they don’t approve of, and when it comes to things like Play Integrity and Play Protection, they can punish you for stepping outside their bounds by breaking certain functionality (for having the audacity to want to control your own device)

            But they can’t outright control anything.

            Which is where the deals come in. They’re making shady deals to keep Android as their money maker and no one elses.

            It’s anti-competitive, because to spite Google’s efforts, there is an actual opportunity for competition on Android, where as on iPhone, there isn’t.

        • Album@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          By enforcing a rule that says apps on the app store cannot have an external paid app store. So that’s why you download FN on sideload instead of the store.

        • takeda@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          11 months ago

          No, then you won’t even be able to use in-app purchases.

          Android supposedly has an option to side load, and even install another store, but in order to do it, you get through a series of warnings, and such stores can’t even be on the play store. So for an ordinary user you feel like you are hacking the phone. So naturally there aren’t many alternatives. The only one that lasted is F-Droid, but it seems to be only used by advanced users who want to run open source software.

          So simply, theoretically they should be able to do whatever they want practically everyone has to stick to play store.

          Play store has a rule, that additional charges need to go through them (and they of course charge 30%). This probably would still be ok, but then certain vendors don’t need to follow the same rules.

                • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  I believe that is the crux of it. And apparently part of the trial exposed that some big players have special deals such that don’t have to pay those in-app purchase commissions, or at least have a smaller commission. And that’s what makes it an abuse of their market position.

            • d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              No, then you won’t even be able to use in-app purchases.

              I didn’t realize that. Never actually tried to buy anything. You can’t even make purchases in the Samsung store? Or Huawei?

              OP is mistaken - you can make purchases in side-loaded apps, only thing is that app can’t use the Google Play APIs for that (obviously) - but they’re free to use PayPal or stripe or w/e payment method. Google has no way of preventing sideloaded apps from doing that, and it’s not like they can ban them either.

              You are put through a series of warnings just like you are when downloading an executable in the browser, or installing it on Windows.

              Actually, there isn’t even any actual “warning” - at least not on my Fold 4 - there was just one dialog to enable installation from unknown sources, with a “Settings” button that takes you directly to the page where you need to tick the box next to your browser, and as soon as you tick the box, you can click on the “Install” button to install it. That’s it. None of the dialogs you interact with has any actual warnings.

          • d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            No, then you won’t even be able to use in-app purchases.

            That’s not true - they wouldn’t be able to use the Google Play APIs for payments of course, but if the app is sideloaded they can definitely use any payment processor / method. If the app isn’t on the Play Store then Google has no say over it.

            Android supposedly has an option to side load, and even install another store, but in order to do it, you get through a series of warnings

            It’s really not as difficult as you make it seem.

            1. Send a link to the user somehow (SMS, email etc); or user goes to the website
            2. Click on the Download button
            3. Open the APK
            4. In the dialog box that pops up, click on the Settings button > then allow Samsung Internet
            5. Click on the Install button

            That’s it. There were no “series of warnings” to go thru, no need to flip between multiple screens or anything. I literally just went thru this process to install the Epic store my Galaxy Fold 4 - which took only a few seconds in total - and it was in no way complicated or “scary” at all. And bear in mind that the audience in this case are gamers - people who are already familiar with the concept of downloading and installing programs on a PC, so it’s not like you’re targeting some tech-illiterate people here.

            The only one that lasted is F-Droid

            Not true again. Aurora Droid and Droid-ify are both reasonably popular, at least in the OSS/enthusiast communities. Yes they use the F-Droid repos but they also subscribe to other repos (Guardian Project, Izzy etc), so you’re getting your apps from multiple sources.

            There are also proprietary stores such as Aptoide which are quite popular in the Asian markets. Finally, you’re completely ignoring other stores which are bundled out-of-the-box on many non-Google phones such as the Galaxy Store on Samsungs, Mi Store on Xiaomis, AppGallery on Huawei etc. Of course, in the western market the Play Store is the most dominant, but the Samsung store is reasonably popular among Samsung users (as they have regular deals on games and various other apps + some exclusives like Good Lock and other Samsung-specific apps), and of course, the OEM stores are also quite popular in Asian markets.

            • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Not OP, and, correct me if I’m misremembering, but you did actually used to have to enable developer options to be able to sideload at all, and Android doesn’t tell you how to do that.

            • yamanii@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              You seem too certain that it’s still simple, but everytime I’m installing a new APK my Xiaomi makes me wait 10 seconds and puts a big, red, scary sign saying how dangerous it is to side load, then finally the ok buttons unlocks and I install my app.

        • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          No I think Google tried to tell Epic they couldn’t have their own processing for in-app purchases. That’s what Epic sued over.

          • Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            There are multiple entities with their own payment processing mechanisms running on Android. Epic was definitely able to run their own if they wanted to.

            • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Many of them are either exceptions made by Google through shady deals or apps that were overlooked by Google before they published the app.

              • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                That’s exactly what sunk Google’s case though. They’re inconsistent. Had they most likely shown they’re consistent to other apps they could have been more likely to get a jury on their side (like in the case with Apple).

    • Aatube@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      But Epic v. Google turned out to be a very different case. It hinged on secret revenue sharing deals between Google, smartphone makers, and big game developers, ones that Google execs internally believed were designed to keep rival app stores down. It showed that Google was running scared of Epic specifically. And it was all decided by a jury, unlike the Apple ruling.

        • Aatube@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          They obviously aren’t forcing everyone to use Google billing, but it seems like an antitrust case gains a lot more ground if the accused pays money to quite a bit of people to prevent them from using competitors. That’s what’s getting Google here, apparently, not real forcing.

    • OscarRobin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Google effectively has a monopoly on the Android app ecosystem and this trial brought to light mountains of evidence that they maintain this through extremely anti-competitive means.

    • Steve@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      None of those are allowed on the Play Store. And when you try to side load an app, it warns you about it being dangerous.

        • Steve@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          The Play Store doesn’t allow other app stores.
          “4.5 You may not use Google Play to distribute or make available any Product that has a purpose that facilitates the distribution of software applications and games for use on Android devices outside of Google Play.” - Google Play Developer Distribution Agreement

          Computers have had warnings about installing software since the beginning of computers

          I think “Computers” go back way farther than you’re imagining. There was a time when you didn’t even install software on computers. You just put in a disk and ran what was on it. We don’t even need to go back to when “Computer” was an actual job title. Something that humans (mostly women) did.

            • Steve@communick.news
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              …huh? Why would there be an app store inside an app store?

              To make it easy to access other app stores of course. You can use one web browser to download another can’t you.

              No I was just speaking simply. You know what I meant.

              Maybe too simply, because I really don’t. Windows didn’t give any warnings about installing any programs until Windows 10 I think. And even then it’s only the truly esoteric and unknown to Microsoft.