• Evia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    What does a ‘strip search’ entail here? Not that I’m excusing the officers actions here - it’s clearly reprehensible to be so callous about religious clothing and for it to have been observed by others via the tv - but I feel very differently if they streamed her naked vs clothed without her abaya

    • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      You might feel differently, but she might not considering what it would mean to her personally based on her culture and religion. I think what matters is that either would be quite violating in this context.

    • MuhammadJesusGaySex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      In my experience a strip search can mean anything from get completely naked squat and cough to get down to your underwear and pull out the waistband all the way around.

      Also it’s always been in front of other arrested people.

    • Ook the Librarian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Exactly, facts of the case matter and the headline is rolling two controversial issues in this case into one.

      I believe the fact you are looking for is that she was searched in the nude in a private room with only one female officer (which itself is against the local policy). But afterwards…

      While Doe waited to have her booking photo taken, she was asked to wait on a bench in the jail’s lobby. The lawsuit states that’s when she realized there was a TV screen “hung right above the door where she had been strip searched” and it was streaming footage from inside the room and facing the lobby, for all in the room to see.

      This is pretty fucked up.

    • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I see no issue with treating religious clothing exactly as what it is, clothing. Just because someone chooses to believe a piece of clothing is magic doesn’t make it so.

      If god doesn’t like it he can come down here and say something.