Elon Musk, the owner of X, criticized advertisers with expletives on Wednesday at The New York Times’s DealBook Summit.

  • Djad2410@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, I don’t disagree my point is there are people that go farther then just voting with there wallet and try to smear other/companies to get what they want.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I just don’t see this happening based on your above claims.

      More to the point, I don’t see a motive or purpose behind doing this. X is not a competitor for them. It makes no sense for them to try to manipulate the market against X.

      • Djad2410@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a tool that they could use and were using to manipulate the American people. Because of a lawsuit with HBO Max it has come to light that the CEO was forcing their interns to make fake Twitter post to shut up their dissenters.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s a tool that they could use and were using to manipulate the American people.

          You’re losing me there bud.

          Because of a lawsuit with HBO Max it has come to light that the CEO was forcing their interns to make fake Twitter post to shut up their dissenters.

          This doesn’t make sense as written

          • Djad2410@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sorry, I am doing this to my phone. The point is they benefit from Twitter going back to before Elon Musk where they could police one side and not the other and control what was available

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              where they could police one side and not the other and control what was available

              how does this benefit a business? Do you see the problem with this reasoning?

              • Djad2410@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Example: if a Disney movie comes out that’s a hot mess Disney could call up one of their points of contact at old twitter to hide, shadow ban, or alternative the likes. Which did happen with the Marvel movie and rotten tomatoes. No that no longer possible at X.

                  • Djad2410@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    There are less insiders working with these companies, X is trying to be neutral, and is trying not to be beholden to outside forces so I would have to disagree with you.