"Accomplished by a team at the Huazhong University of Science and Technology and posted 30 minutes ago.

Why this is evidence: The LK-99 flake slightly levitates for both orientations of the magnetic field, meaning it is not simply a magnetized piece of iron or similar ‘magnetic material’. A simple magnetic flake would be attracted to one polarity of the strong magnet, and repelled by the other. A diamagnet would be repelled under either orientation, since it resists and expels all fields regardless of the polarity.

Caveats There is no way to verify the orientation of the strong magnet in this video, also, there are yet to be published experimental measured values of this sample. Diamagnetism is a property of superconductors but without measured and verified data, this is just suggestive of a result.

Take-away If this synthesis was indeed successful, then this material is easy enough to be made by labs other than the original research team. I would watch carefully for results out of Argonne National Lab, who are reported to be working on their own synthesis of a sample.

This overall corroborates two independent simulation studies that investigated the original Korean authors claim about material and crystal structure, and both studies supported the claims.

Lawrence Berkeley National Lab: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.16892.pdf Shenyang National Lab: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.16040.pdf "

  • wason@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Thanks for the explanation. So, this means we are another step closer to quantum computers for example?

    I’m trying to grasp on this concept and how we could see this in our daily lives. Better batteries? I thought about that because they get hot when charging but not sure if it’s because of the resistance. Going into standard circuits means we’ll have better SoCs? better integrated circuits? Faster computers or phones?

    Im trying to think about a daily life application but maybe it won’t have a direct impact on that area, maybe it’s more about facilitating research that will eventually turn into daily life stuff?

    • Khanzarate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Better batteries, yeah. That’s down the line. We will also generate heat during the actual use of any devices. But, less.

      It also could become the most efficient commercial batteries, but I expect the cost will be prohibitive. Sending electricity always has a loss, but it doesn’t through a superconductor, so these will have a lot of uses at power generation sites, both reducing heat and losslessly storing it (until it enters the traditional grid).

      It won’t directly transfer to faster tech or anything like that, but it helping quantum computing could do so indirectly.

      Definitely it’s more of a facilitating research kinda thing. You can’t play with superconductors in a lab in a cost efficient way, but this could let you.

      Also maglevs and MRI’s directly use superconductors currently, so that’s a direct use, lower cost MRI’s and incredibly fast trains.

      • plutus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Heat is a huge barrier to increasing clock speeds, so a room temperature and pressure superconductor would actually fairly directly translate to major performance gains in computing.

        • Khanzarate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          While true, that’d only be for a superconducting CPU. I doubt this material can both superconduct and act as a transistor, and even if it can, I highly doubt you could pack in anywhere near the amount we have in standard CPUs. So while we might replace a standard power supply with a superconducting one, and reduce heat that way, I don’t see any direct computing boosts from this. We could superconduct everything around a CPU, have superconducting wires, but the heat from a CPU is generated in the silicon.

          It’ll be pretty nice to have 100% efficient PSUs, though. Definitely some gains there, just not the same revolutionary ones seen elsewhere.

        • UndefinedIsNotAFunction@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is where my mind went. Wondered if the reduction in heat would allow further overclocking/defaults on both CPU and GPUs. I don’t know that much about the actual hardware and how it works though.

          • Khanzarate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not really. First, standard equipment is limited by cost, not technology. Nothing stopping some power user from using liquid nitrogen to cool a desktop, it’s just costly. Superconductor tech, though, would be bleeding edge, it wouldn’t cost any less for a long time. Supercomputing, on the other hand, has had access to more esoteric cooling systems, and can already use them. They also have had access to the extreme cold superconductors that have already existed.

            The real issue there is the CPU makes the heat, but this tech isn’t a transistor. We can’t replace the silicon chips with superconducting ones, at least not in a form dense enough to be a CPU. There’s lots of small improvements around the CPU we can make, but those aren’t at the “wow, this will revolutionize technology” level. They’re cool but it’s the other stuff that’s gonna get the focus.

          • woefkardoes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Managing heat is a large part of circuit design. Superconductors can fundamentally change everything about it meaning far smaller much faster and more capable in every way. As an example 95%+ of modern CPU’s and GPUs are cooling related. The actual chips are tiny in comparison to the whole component.

      • wason@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Got it. So it’ll eventually lead to develop or improve daily stuff. I hope this material becomes a reality.

    • rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      A conductor with no resistance is a big deal for many electrical applications. Electrical resistance is often a big part of design. Removing that aspect changes things significantly. Electrical power losses and the size of conductors can be greatly reduced.

      I’ve read lots of unsubstantiated claims about superconductors. A solution has to be producible in quantity at a reasonable cost. Otherwise it’s not going to be a breakthrough. I mean we currently have expensive and bulky superconductor solutions, but they’re limited to applications where it’s reasonable such as MRI machines and particle accelerators.

      An inexpensive room temperature superconductor would make the most difference in tech sectors such as power transmission, electromechanical, and power electronics. These are areas where power loss due to circuit resistance is a big part of design. The impact would be minimal for computing and logic. There may be areas where power loss can be reduced, but logic relies on semi-conductors which must have resistance to function, it’s in the name. The term “semi” implies resistance.

      • httpjames@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Would this potential superconductor work in devices like phones and laptops? Would it lead to more efficient operation?

        • rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Would this potential superconductor work in devices like phones and laptops? Would it lead to more efficient operation?

          If inexpensive it could be used in power components for consumer electronics like phones and laptops, but wouldn’t make a huge difference since most of the power consumption occurs in chips and displays where superconductors wouldn’t apply. Though it could lead to some reduction in size and better efficiency. Battery operated devices are considered low power. High power applications are where superconductors offer the most benefit.

    • Contramuffin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      One thing that you’ll definitely observe in daily life is the development of fusion reactors. They’re significantly safer than regular nuclear reactors (which run on fission), and also a lot cheaper (theoretically). The current downside to fusion reactors is that up until this point, it usually takes up more energy to run it than the energy that gets produced. So in other words, it doesn’t actually generate enough energy to make it worth building. Most of the energy spent is trying to keep the magnets in the reactor cold enough to function. Since room temperature superconductors should function at room temperature, there will be no need to keep them cold, so a lot of the energy spent keeping the magnets cold will become unnecessary. This will significantly improve the development of fusion reactors, to the point where it is possible that we may even see fusion reactors on our energy grid in our lifetimes. Basically, if this claim is true, you can expect that energy costs will become virtually negligible and the world will almost completely run on renewable energy

      • wason@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well I really hope this is real then and more importantly it translates to cheap, clean energy