this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2023
1819 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

59192 readers
2452 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 301 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Now this is the kind of growth factor the Fediverse needs, not Threads.

[–] garretble@lemmy.world 192 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I know I’m not the only one who has been saying that this type of move makes perfect sense for governments and news organizations, but I’m going to go ahead and take credit for this.

You’re welcome, guys!

[–] skoadphilmore@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] cedarmesa@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ren@lemmy.world 97 points 1 year ago

This makes so much sense.

BBC wouldn't make their news site under Google Blogger... so why depend on other corporations for your microblogging?

Spin up your own server, have your own verification, then use it on your site and share outs.

[–] HipPriest@kbin.social 90 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm a fan of the BBC, they make a lot of terrific programmes and the breadth of the audience their radio stations cater to is pretty phenomenal.

They also have a history of experimenting with technology so it's not a total surprise they've taken this step. Since most people on Mastodon are either sharing British news sources from the BBC or The Guardian anyway it will be interesting to see how they fare...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LakesLem@lemm.ee 70 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I may be misremembering but seem to recall them being early to Tw*tter too. Good sign

[–] moosetwin@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago (10 children)

my guy you don't have to censor the word twitter

[–] NuPNuA@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The childish censorship of names of people and things has been one of my biggest internet bug bears over the last few years.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] xxcarpaii@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Maybe they were talking about twatter

[–] Serpardum@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Are we supposed to call it X now? What a dumb name, in my opinion.

[–] OtakuAltair@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

'The site formerly known as twitter'

The unpleasantly long name just makes it funnier imo

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] 17451k@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

It would be funny to censor X just with a single *

[–] PlexSheep@feddit.de 56 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] vext01@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Very!

This could set a precedent!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] clgoh@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (21 children)

...and already blocked by at least one instance, mastodon.art.

https://mastodon.art/@Curator/110809888584495290

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

While I don't think it's necessarily sufficient to justify defederating their whole instance, it's worth noting that the reason they gave is definitely accurate. The BBC is incredibly transphobic. Here's a Wikipedia article about one of their worst, most prominent instances. It's no more so than is pretty standard in Britain these days, sadly, but that's not a good bar to measure yourself against.

There was a big campaign of utilising the BBC's complaints process to complain about the many flaws in that article. Here's a YouTube video by one person involved in that campaign. That's part 1 of 4 as the different stages of the process played out. The TL;DW is that the BBC ended up ignoring the complaints and ended up picking up on small flaws in the way the complaint was phrased (or just making up flaws where they didn't really exist) to use as an excuse to "respond" saying there was no problem with their journalistic standards.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ominouslemon@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

When I see this shit I lose all hope in the Fediverse's success

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 25 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I think it's just the one server run by a mentalcase tbh. Not the first time I've seen them mentioned. The other thing was them freaking out because of GIMP.

[–] kb99@lemmynsfw.com 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s honestly great to have the people who like to complain about things separated from the things they complain about. It sets for a more positive vibe in general, and probably does wonders for their blood pressure as well.

I think anyone who disagrees with this decision would have left that instance a long time ago anyway :)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Zoldyck@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

This is so dumb. Jesus.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] Spudwart@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This could really get the ball rolling

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think this may be the year if the Linux desktop as well

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ghariksforge@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (9 children)

The Dutch Government also launched an instance not that long ago. It's a pity it took so long, but Musk's antics are finally forcing people to move.

[–] Plagiatus@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

German Public broadcast also has its own instance, as does the government.

[–] ominouslemon@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] OtakuAltair@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago

This is great! The Dutch government made their own official instance (social.overheid.nl) too!

[–] arc@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago

It's a smart thing for news sources and ngos to do - run an instance and use it to issue posts and provide a platform for journalists. Twitter and other platforms can still receive posts but the "source of truth" is the Mastodon server

[–] flower3@feddit.de 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Didn’t know they have their own TLD

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can imagine all the domain names that people would come up with if .bbc TLD was public lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dan@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That is fucking awesome.

I love the BBC, I hate seeing what it's been forced to turn into by threats from a succession of Conservative governments. I still pay my TV license despite pirating all my TV and movie content for years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pectoralis@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

How can one add social.bbc to my Lemmy subscribed list?

[–] roguetrick@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Lemmy doesn't do microblogging.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sab@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You cannot follow the entire instance as such, rather the individual accounts on the instance - such as @BBCRD, @BBC_News_Labs, @Connected_Studio etc.

Kbin users can subscribe to whatever content is shared from social.bbc on federated instances by subscribing to /d/social.bbc, but I'm not sure how much sense that makes. :)

Edit: In Lemmy you'd find the users by entering for example /u/BBCRD@social.bbc, but as @roguetrick pointed out Lemmy is not really made for microblogging.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] malloc@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I love this. No more “blue checkmarks” or paid verification processes. Just check the domain of the post(s) to confirm they are legit.

load more comments
view more: next ›