• Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Didnt they then post a link showing that dall-e could combine two different things into something its never seen before?

    Did you read the whole comment? Even if the text model describing things is irrelevant the dall-e part is not.

    • Zuberi 👀@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is irrelevant. Armchairs are not people. Dali does not know what is inside of those objects. Or under their fabrics for instance. Ask Dali to cut open the Avacado armchair.

      I’m sorry if I’m not buying your defense of CSAM.

      But the Dali use case of “an illustration of a baby daikon radish in a tutu walking a dog" can’t possibly be the best example to use here to defend child porn.

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m sorry if I’m not buying your defense of CSAM.

        Thanks for making it clear you’re either arguing in bad faith, or that you’re incapable of talking about actual issues the moment anyone mentions CSAM.

      • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Im sorry? My defense of CSAM?

        What defence of CSAM?

        Do you require mental assistance? You appear to be having some kind of aneurism…