• Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So PA is going to be officially surrounded by legal states, while only having medical

    This is worse than the fireworks.

    • Bone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel like they are just fleecing people through the medical system at this point. ID cards, goofy doctors, etc. Enough is enough.

      The system is growing exponentially. I was given those numbers by one of the goofy doctors. Pretty remarkable!

    • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      We New Hampshirites are as well.

      Our state is called the “Live Free or Die State” too. So much for that bullshit as long as Republicans are in charge.

    • ShunkW@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t worry. Many lawmakers in Ohio have already said they’ll immediately overrule it via legislation. Dunno the legality of what they’ve said, but I wouldn’t put it past them.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Many lawmakers in Ohio have already said they’ll immediately overrule it via legislation.

        I would imagine any legislative actions would be ruled unconstitutional as the method of legalization was a state Constitutional amendment.

        • cm0002@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          method of legalization was a state Constitutional amendment.

          No fucking way lmfao that’s hilarious 😂 Cheers to any Ohioions 🌿 reading this

          • enragedzeus05@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            From a different site I came across. I am not politically savvy but this doesn’t sound like an amendment the way issue 1 was.

            “Since Issue 2 is an initiated statute, lawmakers are free to change or toss out the version that voters approve. But even though GOP leaders disapprove of recreational marijuana, a total repeal seems unlikely. They may instead look at the revenue distribution or impose additional requirements.”

            Source: https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/politics/elections/2023/11/07/what-would-ohios-marijuana-and-abortion-ballot-issues-do/71485973007/

            Edit: spelling is hard

            • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              This is basically how it goes with “begrudging legalization”. The legislature figures out exactly how much they can get away with pushing back while still keeping their seats. There was a little of this in Massachusetts, with the Governor and Mayor both speaking out against legalization when the Question made the ballot.

              They dragged their feet for a while on licensing, and gave retails licenses to friends first. If I recall correctly, an overturn vote made it to the next ballot. They rolled it out slower. They jacked up the pot tax an extra 8% (10.75% tax on top of our sales tax AND an optional 3% local tax). They added the silly “5mg per dose of edibles” limit. All stuff they could get away with, but that makes the bill more palatable to pot-haters.

        • Kepabar@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The legislature can and will find ways to neuter the amendment.

          They did it here in Florida when we voted to restore the rights of felons after their punishment was complete.

          The legislature ruled that the felons had to pay back all outstanding fees before they could get their rights back. Felons get changed by the jail for their stay, so most leave with 100s of thousands in debt on the books.

          Then the state purposely makes it impossible for felons to even find out how much they owe, meaning even if they were to somehow get the money paying is very difficult.

          It has effectively prevented any felons from getting their voting rights back. I think the actual number who have is less than 10 and we passed that amendment in 2020.

      • donuts@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Imagine being so brazenly undemocratic that you’d try to overturn the will of the people themselves. 😩

        • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Welcome to Republicans. They openly believe that law should never be based on the will of the majority. It’s why they draw heirarchy-focused voters. A Republican Vote isn’t “they will honor our wants and needs” as much as “I trust them to be my manager, and make hard decisions I might not like”

          I think a real government needs a little of both sometimes, but a WHOLE LOT more “will of the majority” and only a little “hard decisions I might not like”. They feel the other way around.

      • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m hoping they’re just showboating… but also if they want to actually take that poison pill… it’s their own funeral.