President Joe Biden — perhaps the nation’s biggest Amtrak fan — is set to promote new federal investments for trains on the heavily trafficked Northeast Corridor.

The Democratic president is headed to Bear, Delaware, on Monday to announce more than $16 billion in new funding that will go toward 25 passenger rail projects between Boston and Washington, the White House says. Bear is located about 12 miles (20 kilometers) from Biden’s home of Wilmington.

His remarks will be held at the Amtrak Bear Maintenance Shops, where trains are maintained and repaired. The investments, the White House says, will help trains run faster, cut delays and create union jobs.

  • Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    128
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why is decent rail service, like basic medical care, a contentious issue in the U.S.? Even this article casts shade by saying ‘Bear is located about 12 miles (20 kilometers) from Biden’s home of Wilmington.’ As if having access to public transportation is some kind of left wing elite privelege that no one else can utilize.

    • Phegan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because conservatives have tricked people into believing that spending money for quality of life improvements is bad.

      It cuts into the money we give military contractors.

          • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Thats not what socialism is. Socialism is basically collective ownership of all of the means of production. Its a term used by a variety of egalitarian (classless) political theories.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      One part of the problem is that Congress has a rural bias, so there are a lot of rural Congresspersons who don’t see the benefit of better rail service so they won’t vote for it.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why is decent rail service treated as something only the north east can have? Like, I’m glad they’re getting more, but it can be frustrating how there’s a fair amount in one area and basically none west of the Appalachian mountains.

    • Igloojoe@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      America is about twice the size of all of Europe. Railroads were controlled by monopoly rich people. Once America became more industrialized, planes became a better cargo transit option. That and the interstate system made trucks an even better economical option. Railroads were not an option as they were expensive and land intensive(which also meant more money for acquiring land)

      For medical care, the US government actually spends a bunch on healthcare on par with most other countries. Just that a majority of the monet will go to a bloated medical company into a billionair’s pocket before any of it applies to an individual.

      So, extreme capitalism ruined both. Yet we have politicians and people who think we should push further towards a capitalistic way of running things…

      • Redscare867@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Railroads are land intensive but somehow 27 lane highways aren’t? Also wait until you find out how expensive it is to maintain all of those highways…

        • Igloojoe@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          Railroads have always been business owned. So acquiring land is expensive for them. Highways and interstates are government owned. So they just forced owners to accept the appraised value.

          • Redscare867@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            1 year ago

            And for whatever reason you think we couldn’t do literally the exact same thing we did with highways to build nationalized rail?

            • Igloojoe@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I wish we did. It seems logical that railroads should be government run transit option.

            • AA5B@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              We could call it, let’s see, hmmm …. America’s Track? I wish there was a way to shorten that …. AmeriTrack? … AmRail?

              • Redscare867@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                You might be on to something, but I gotta say this all sounds vaguely familiar for some reason 🤔

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            1 year ago

            Do you have even the slightest idea how much land we already have for railroads that already existed but have been abandoned?

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            No they aren’t. Amtrak is literally a publicly owned company. Basically all passenger rail in the United States is Amtrak in the modern era

      • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        California is as densely populated as Spain, which has an excellent high speed rail network, the northeastern US has densities comparable with Central Europe and the rest of the East coast is well within the ranges seen in western Europe.

      • ares35@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        the u.s. spends up to twice as much on health care, and doesn’t cover ‘as much’ or ‘as many’, as those other nations that have nationalized or ‘socialized’ health care programs.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        America is about twice the size

        I’m going with “size doesn’t matter” here; it’s all politics. On the one hand we have a political requirement that all these long distance routes be kept running, even if they’ll never be viable, never be funded adequately. But on the other hand most of the population is in urban/suburban areas that could be effectively served by good rail service. We don’t have the political will power to create good rail service where it’s most effective, most needed, but we do waste money on bad rail service where it will never be effective

        Railroads were not an option as they were expensive and land intensive

        I’m not buying this, since the tracks and right of way used to exist. Yes it’s really expensive to acquire now, and that’s going to happen since centers of population change but you can’t use this as an historical reason, because historically we had a lot more train service.

      • SeaJ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe North America but Europe is larger than the US and especially the contiguous US. There are also a shit ton of different countries in Europe which all have different laws and standards which are not easy to work with. They seemed to be able to do just fine. Although they did not cater near as much to auto manufacturers and rip up rail line we did in the US.

        As for medical care, the US spends significantly more per person (19% of GDP vs 10-11% for most others) and you are correct that the main reason for that is bloated medical companies.