In the past six years, 19 states have made efforts to move to year-round daylight saving time. So what’s in the way?

  • derf82@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    And sunrise would be 5am in June. And you ignore that sunset would be 6:20pm instead of 5:20.

    The fact is, Boise gets just 9 hours of daylight. Pick your poison. I’d rather the light when I might be able to enjoy it.

    • ExFed@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d rather the light when I might be able to enjoy it.

      There’s a subtext to every DST vs. ST argument that never gets talked about: how much control people have over their own schedules. If, instead of shifting your clock, you could instead shift your schedule, wouldn’t that achieve the same result?

      • derf82@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t want to change my schedule. I don’t want to have to go to work an hour earlier just so I can get daylight in the evening.

        • ExFed@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          So you’d rather change everybody else’s schedule to meet your desires? Because that’s what DST is: the government telling its people to change their schedules by an hour.

          • derf82@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Who says I’m changing everyone else’s schedule? I the one that DOESN’T want the clocks to change.

            • ExFed@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m not arguing for changing clocks twice a year. I’m arguing that permanent DST is no better than permanent Standard Time when it comes to scheduling. The difference is that people are falsely convinced permanent DST will give them “more daylight” when it will not. Schedules have always shifted between seasons. We can’t do anything about the motion of planets, but we can decide to go to work an hour earlier to maximize how much continuous time we have after work to do yardwork or whatever.

              Today, we have this arbitrary “9 to 5” work schedule. Give it 20 years of permanent DST, and we’ll start wishing we “had more daylight” because we have a “10 to 6” work schedule. They’re just numbers. Why not choose the simpler standard?

              • derf82@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I already go to work in the dark most of the year. It is the time change that robs me of that that it takes what was a dark hour to a slightly less dark hour, all the while costing me that hour earlier. Perhaps you think I work 9-5. No, I work 7-4. I have no desire to go to work an hour earlier, because it’s not arbitrary. The rest of the world operates on a schedule by necessity. Further changing my start time puts me further out of sync with everyone else.

                I never said DST gives more daylight. I said it puts the daylight where I want it.

                • ExFed@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Perhaps you think I work 9-5.

                  Apologies. I was using “9 to 5” to mean “a standard work schedule that doesn’t actually exist for most people except as a cliche.”

                  I have no desire to go to work an hour earlier

                  But that’s exactly what permanent DST is! Just because the clock still says “7 xDT” instead of “7 xST” doesn’t make it the same time. The sun still rises and sets on it’s own time no matter what our clocks say. Circadian rhythms ultimately depend on sunrise, zenith, and sunset, not some number on a clock. Switching between ST and DST effectively forces the whole world to adopt a “winter” schedule and a “summer” schedule, but in an incredibly disruptive and politically-charged way.

                  I agree that changing clocks twice a year is a bad idea. My point is, if we’re going to pick one, it should be the one that is based on the motion of the planet. The whole world has to coordinate schedules anyways. So let’s use a standard that more closely matches our biology, not some “you’ll save daylight” marketing.

                  Or maybe we should all agree to live in the future and just use UTC…

                  • derf82@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    But that’s exactly what permanent DST is! Just because the clock still says “7 xDT” instead of “7 xST” doesn’t make it the same time.

                    Yes it is, because everything else around me moves an hour. I have to move because time is standardized. When time goes to standard time, if I just kept the same schedule, everything else moves an hour later: sporting events I might want to watch, social gatherings I might want to go to, and so on. Thus, I wind up being up “later” and thus want to get up “later.” No man is an island. I can’t just stay on a DST schedule by myself.

                    And I don’t think standard matches our biology in some magical way. Noon is the middle of 5”the daylight, but for most people, the middle of there day is closer to 1pm.

    • maryjayjay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      In June on dst sunset is after 9:30pm. I don’t need it to be light at 10:00, it’s frankly annoying. I actually enjoy it being light when I drive to work in the morning.

      The fact is, the US tried permanent dst in the 70s and everyone hated it. It’s why we took it back

      • derf82@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would rather it light at 10pm than 3:30am.

        I enjoy having light in the morning. But I enjoy light in the evening MORE.

        And I have discussed the 70s event elsewhere in this post. It was horribly implemented (changing clocks in both October and then in January) and even then some people liked it. It certainly wasn’t “everyone.”