this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
240 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37708 readers
202 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

From article:

If you have the Brave Browser installed on your Windows devices, then you may also have Brave VPN services installed on the machine. Brave installs these services without user consent on Windows devices.

More reason to ditch the crypto bro browser.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 75 points 1 year ago (1 children)

ugh, don't touch my network stack

[–] funkajunk@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not that I'm defending anybody but how is this touching your "network stack" any more than any other application?

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

because a VPN is both a new network interface, and it has the ability to change how your traffic routes. Most applications don't do that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

https://old.reddit.com/r/brave_browser/comments/17b0pxl/brave_appears_to_install_vpn_services_without/k5kwd97/

https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/issues/33726

And crypto are disabled by default.

No, I wont' ditch it. It's the best browser out there, right now, since scummy/corrupt/hypocrite Mozilla (which, remember, is in bed with Google, Amazon and Facebook while criticizing them) decided that Firefox is just a side project for them and they're deceiving people making them believe that donations fund FF development.

Don't even bother to reply. I'm not going to fuel this shitty thread any further.

[–] WastedJobe@feddit.de 122 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"In bed with"=takes their money to have their search engine and lets you change it in 30 seconds while being completely open source

I don't see the problem.

[–] 30p87@feddit.de 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Norgur@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fine, for you I'll do it in 4!

[–] 30p87@feddit.de 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

0.980s by using ydotool key 29:1 20:1 20:0 29:0 -d 0 && ydotool type "about>preferences\n" -d 0 && sleep 0.26 && ydotool type "search engine\t" -d 0 && ydotool key 103:1 103:0 -d 20

[–] flora_explora@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Tbf, changing the default search engine probably has the effect that the vast majority of users will stick with it. So, although it is pretty easy for you and me to change the search engine, it still promotes Google quite a lot and thus undermines the independent character of Firefox as a whole.

[–] WastedJobe@feddit.de 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Absolutely. I would prefer they didn't have google as the default, but I'd rather have Firefox with good funding and google as default than firefox with very little funding.

[–] flora_explora@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

That's a fair point, yes

[–] pixel@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And brave being built on chromium is somehow markedly better?

[–] flora_explora@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

I wasn't defending chromium or brave, not even commenting on them at all. I was just adding a caveat to what the other commenter said about Firefox.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 84 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'd say so

https://lemm.ee/comment/4924770

solution that wipes the extremely profitable, For-Profit, Mozilla Corporation off your Internet

Mozilla should be removed from the entire internet but hey, it's a beginning.

[–] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago

Does anyone want to switch seats!?! looks around nervously

[–] toothpicks@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

I'm rickety AF

[–] Norgur@kbin.social 74 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No one told you to ditch it. But can you fanboii a little less aggressively, please?

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@beehaw.org 61 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Have you ever interacted with a Brave user? No, they can't.

[–] interolivary@beehaw.org 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I swear they all have some sort of brain slug that makes them cultish and just generally unlikeable

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@beehaw.org 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you look at what a raging tool the CEO is and the implications of the browser's association with crypto (no matter how optional), I think that Brave just attracts that type of person

[–] beefcat@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Makes sense given that the Brave CEO is a member of an actual cult.

[–] renard_roux@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] beefcat@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

the mormon church. it’s the reason he donates money to anti-lgbt causes.

[–] pbjamm@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Thought for sure the answer was going to be the Cult of Crypto

[–] sculd@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

I actually didn't know that when I opened this thread!!!

[–] Rikj000@discuss.tchncs.de 69 points 1 year ago (1 children)

True open source projects like LibreWolf, Ungoogled Chromium > Sketchy world of Brave

[–] ByteWelder@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I applaud LibreWolf’s efforts, but the hard-coded timezone makes it unusable for me. Other than that, it’s a great browser. I used it several months until the timezone confusion got the best of me.

[–] klangcola@reddthat.com 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What's the deal with the timezone?

[–] ByteWelder@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

If I recall correctly, it was meant as a measure against fingerprinting. It’s basically one less thing to uniquely define a user based on the info that the browser gives to a website. I’m not sure if it’s still like that, cause it’s been easily a year since I used LibreWolf.

[–] baggins@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes, what is the deal? I can't say that I've noticed any issues. Am in UK if that makes a difference. And I usually run it through Proton VPN.

[–] Aatube@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

While I’ve never used LibreWolf before (I use Waterfox), that probably does make a difference as the UK is UTC+0.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] abhibeckert@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Two issues.

First of all a lot of websites show times in your current timezone. Beehaw for example says you wrote your post "2 days ago". Depending what timezone my browser is in, that could display 3 days or 1 day. When I hover over it, it shows the exact date/time in my timezone. Which is handy.

Second it doesn't actually achieve the intended goal. Even if you use a VPN chances are you've set it to give you a public IP address close to you to have good performance. And if your IP address is in Proton's London datacentre but your timezone is UTC+0 when everyone else is UTC+1... well you stand out like a single black sheep in a flock of white ones and ad networks are absolutely fingerprinting you with that.

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 57 points 1 year ago

It's still a behavior like "we are the best software in the world, once we get admin permission we can do whatever we want without additional user consent, people appreciate it".

No. You must ask permission to install useless Windows services, even if they're disabled.

[–] lukini@beehaw.org 41 points 1 year ago

Don't even bother to reply. I'm not going to fuel this shitty thread any further.

Nah I'm gonna pile on. Firefox is better.

[–] unreliable@discuss.tchncs.de 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You a full of mins information that only benefit google having full internet monopoly. Brave is chrome. Chrome is google.

[–] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 29 points 1 year ago

You’re the one who made it shitty. But much to crap on the bed then get up and leave.

[–] DidacticDumbass@lemmy.one 8 points 1 year ago

Somehow I trust Opera and Microsoft over Brave as this point.

What a world.

[–] toothpicks@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

None of these companies know the first thing about consent, it's disgusting

[–] toothpicks@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Just because I bought something from you doesn't mean I consent to you penetrating my inbox

[–] penquin@lemmy.kde.social 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Jaxseven@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What's the difference from Chromium? Main "selling" point?

[–] MikaTech@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm considering it, but how does thorium handle Google's recent Web manifest updates that break true ad blockers like uBlock origin?

I've been pretty happy with the customizability of librefox with the userchrome.css and ublock still works with YouTube.

[–] penquin@lemmy.kde.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, you have two options. The same developer of thorium does have a Firefox one and it's called mercury. Blazing fast, too. Or you can install adblock detection bypass extension on thorium. It is an extension that's made to work with chrome alongside ublock origin to bypass YouTube adblock detection. In fact, I literally just ran into that issue today and the other extension fixed it.

load more comments
view more: next ›