• AllPintsNorth@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      If they are doing as much charity work as they claim they are, then there’s no issue, since it will all be deductible.

      No harm, no foul. Only hurts the liars and the cheats. Win, win.

        • AllPintsNorth@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 months ago

          Sorry to be the one to break it to you, but they already do that.

          No violation of the first amendment at all.

        • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          This isn’t remotely how this works. It’s not based on the acts being done, it’s based on whether the organization is being run to make money, or of it’s spending all it’s revenue in pursuit of a purpose.

            • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              Many of them ARE. That’s the problem.

              You chosing to ignore the abusers doesn’t mean it’s not happening. One would think you would WANT those taking advantage of the system to make the thing you like look bad to be fixed. But here you are defending them

        • Maeve@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          You’re not wrong, and neither are they. Non-profit charities should be able to pay taxes if income exceeds a reasonable amount and have deduction on FMV of benefits provided. Small charitable organizations should be exempt. Everyone should be required to keep records subject to unannounced auditing. Churches like Joel Osteen and creflo dollar should be under criminal investigation or simply go away.