With an abundance of vacant property and limited access to fresh produce, Mission of Mary Cooperative stepped in.
  • AllPintsNorth@lemm.eeEnglish
    12·
    2 months ago

    Sorry to be the one to break it to you, but they already do that.

    No violation of the first amendment at all.

          • AllPintsNorth@lemm.eeEnglish
            10·
            2 months ago

            That’s quite the claim, given there’s nothing in the 1A about charity or taxation. What case law/SCOTUS ruling are you basing that off of?

              • AllPintsNorth@lemm.eeEnglish
                12·
                2 months ago

                I know you tried to, incorrectly, invoke the establishment clause. That wasn’t my question. I asked for the case law/ruling.

                Because I don’t recall anything coming up in my Con Law classes even remotely close to that, and since you seem to be so confident in the issue, I assume you have something more than just your own feelings on the matter to back it up.

                So, what case law lead you to your conclusion? Please be specific.

          • Bronzebeard@lemm.eeEnglish
            4·
            2 months ago

            If they’re being treated the same as any other nonprofit, how is this in violation of the establishment clause?

            NOT treating them the same, like they currently are, is the thing in violation of that clause.